ST. JOSEPHS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCOT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the show cause notices issued for levying penalties were bad in law because they did not clearly specify the charges or faults against the assessees. This lack of specificity prejudiced the assessees' ability to defend themselves, violating principles of natural justice.
What were the facts?
The assessees, St. Joseph's Educational Trust and St. Joseph's Institute of Science & Technology Trust, appealed against penalties levied under Section 270A and Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act. The core issue revolved around the validity of the show cause notices (SCNs) issued for these penalties.
What were the issues?
Whether the show cause notices issued for penalty levy were legally valid and sufficiently specific to allow the assessee to present a proper defense.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(13)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory2,590 citing359 ITR 565 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows791 citing73 Taxmann.com 241 · 2016 · HC
- Mr. Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh v. ACIT672 citing434 ITR 1 · 2021 · HC
- CIT v. Kaushalya511 citing216 ITR 660 · 1995 · HC
- Mak Data Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT443 citing358 ITR 593 · 2013 · SC · Read judgment
- Babuji Jacob v. ITO74 citing430 ITR 259 · 2021 · HC
- Prem Brothers Infrastructure LLP v. NFAC32 citing142 Taxmann.com 38 · 2022 · HC
- 1. ACIT v. Marvel Associates (ITAT Vishakhapatnam) 2. Smt. Aparna Agrawal vs. DCIT21 citing105 Taxmann.com 233 · 2019 · ITAT
- Jaina Marketing & Associates v. DCIT14 citing162 Taxmann.com 439 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- Padam Chand Pungliya v. ACIT11 citing119 Taxmann.com 446 · 2020
- Chandra Suresh Kothari v. DCIT10 citing135 Taxmann.com 275 · 2022
- Enrica Enterprises P. Ltd. v. DCIT10 citing163 Taxmann.com 105 · 2024
- (Mumbai-Trib) 2. Kishor Digambar Patil v. Income Tax Officer6 citing149 Taxmann.com 502 · 2023
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी एबी टी. वक", "ाियक सद" एवं एवं एवं एवं "ी जगदीश, लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.3293 & 3294/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 & 2020-21
v. St. Joseph’s Educational Trust, The DCIT, 56-C, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Central Circle-1(3), Sholinganallur, Chennai. Chennai-600 119. [PAN: AAMTS 3888 G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)
आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.3295 to 3297/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 to 2020-21
v. St. Joseph’s Institute of Science & The DCIT, Technology Trust, Central Circle-1(3), 56-C, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Chennai. Sholinganallur, Chennai-600 119. [PAN: AAHTS 9943 B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)
अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr. V. Balaji, CA & Mr. K.R. Vasudevan, Advocate by Virtual ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent by : Ms. Anitha, Addl.CIT : सुनवाईक"तारीख/Date of Hearing 04.04.2025 : घोषणाक"तारीख /Date of Pronouncement 06.06.2025
ITA Nos.3293 & 3294/Chny/2024 (AYs 2018-19 & 2020-21) St. Joseph’s Educational Trust & ITA Nos.3295 to 3297/Chny
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 270A
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Kkg Associates, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1)…ITA 345/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rama Naidu Gutha, Anantapur vs ITO, Ward -1, AnantapurITA 1895/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026