1. ACIT v. Marvel Associates (ITAT Vishakhapatnam) 2. Smt. Aparna Agrawal vs. DCIT
105 Taxmann.com 233Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2019#5481 most cited
What is 1. ACIT v. Marvel Associates (ITAT Vishakhapatnam) 2. Smt. Aparna Agrawal vs. DCIT authority for?
Disclosure of income in a statement recorded under section 132(4) is not automatically considered undisclosed income for the purpose of penalty under section 271AAB unless it is tested against the definition of undisclosed income in the Explanation to section 271AAB.
21
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Smt. Aparna Agrawal vs. DCIT · 105 Taxmann.com 233 · section 271AAB · undisclosed income · section 132(4) · search and seizure · penalty levy · Explanation to section 271AAB
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing 1. ACIT v. Marvel Associates (ITAT Vishakhapatnam) 2. Smt. Aparna Agrawal vs. DCIT
Showing 1–20 of 21 · Page 1 of 2