THE CHENNAI GOV & GOV UNDERTAKINGS EMP COOP SOCIETY LIMITED NO. 980 ,CHENNAI vs. THE ASSESSING OFFICER, NON CORP WARD 9(1) CHE/, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noted the assessee's non-compliance during assessment and before CIT(A), and set aside the appeal to the file of the AO for denovo adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a credit co-operative society, filed its return for AY 2021-22 offering Nil income after claiming deductions under Section 80P. The AO passed an assessment order making additions and increasing the total income significantly. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed for non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be set aside for denovo adjudication due to non-compliance by the assessee during assessment and appellate proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & HON’BLE SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश / O R D E R
PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter in short ‘the Ld.CIT(A)’), dated 14.03.2024 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter in short ‘AY’) 2021-22.
At the outset, it is noted that the appeal has been filed after delay of ‘231’ days and the assessee has filed an affidavit explaining the delay. Having gone & SA/Chny/2025 (AY 2021-22) The Chennai Gov & GOV Undertakings Emp Coop Society Limited through the contents of the affidavit, we are satisfied that there is sufficient cause for the delay. Therefore, we condone the delay of ‘231’ days and proceed to adjudicate the grounds of appeal
raised by the assessee.
3. The brief facts of the case are that :
The appellant is a credit co-operative society engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its members and Interest/Dividend from Investment in other co-operative society as per the information available on records. The appellant has filed the return of income on for A.Y.2021-22 on 15.02.2022 offering a gross total income of Rs.5,59,00,982/- and total income of Rs. Nil after claiming deduction of Rs.5,59,00,982/- under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Subsequently, the AO passed assessment order u/s 143(3)r.w.s. 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 21/12/2022. The assessing officer held that since the Audit report was not filled as per the provisions of the income tax deductions based on tentative financials statements cannot be allowed apart from this Assessing Officer also made the addition of Rs. 8,90,59,482/- which was the reduction in the share capital from the previous year based on the tentative financials at the time of fling the return of income. Thereby by making total income of Rs. 14,49,60,464/-. The assessee challenged the order of the AO passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144B dated 21.12.2022 before the CIT(A).
The ld. CIT(A) has given 4 hearing notices to the assessee but no response from the assessee. Hence, ld. CIT(A) proceeded with appeal hearings based upon the documents on record, confirmed the order of AO & SA/Chny/2025 (AY 2021-22) The Chennai Gov & GOV Undertakings Emp Coop Society Limited and dismissed the appeal of the assessee on merits as well as non- compliance. Now, assessee is in further appeal before us.
The Ld. Authorized Representative (A.R) of the assessee has submitted the assessee inadvertently not received the hearing notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A). He further submitted that during the assessment proceedings full information was not submitted. Therefore, he prayed for one more opportunity to substantiate its case before Ld. CIT(A) or AO.
The Ld. Departmental Representative (DR), on the other hand, has relied on the orders of the Ld. CIT(A) and pleaded for the dismissal of the assessee’s appeal.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. We note that during the assessment proceedings full compliance has not been made by the assessee to the queries raised by the AO. We also find that there was no appearance or representation of assessee before the ld.CIT(A). Hence, in the light of aforesaid factual position and in the interest of substantial justice, we deem it fit to set aside this appeal to the file of ld.AO for denovo adjudication subject to cost of Rs.25,000/- which shall be deposited by the assessee within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order to ‘Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority’ at Hon’ble High Court of Madras. The proof of the same & SA/Chny/2025 (AY 2021-22) The Chennai Gov & GOV Undertakings Emp Coop Society Limited will be furnished by the Assessee before Ld.AO whose shall proceed for denovo assessment after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case forthwith without any fail, failing which Ld.AO shall be at liberty to proceed with the assessment proceedings as per law. The ld. counsel has also assured this Bench that he will submit the particulars of the assessee viz; email id, address and mobile number of the assessee on record. He further, assured that the assessee will appear and co-operate before the revenue authorities.
In result, the appeal filed by the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes.
SA 14/Chny/2025: Since, we have set aside the appeal in to the file of AO for denovo assessment, hence the stay application SA 14/Chny/2025 is become infructuous.
Order pronounced on the 23rd day of July, 2025, in Chennai.
Sd/- Sd/- (एस.आर.रघुनाथा) (मनु कुमाि गिरि) (S. R. RAGHUNATHA) (MANU KUMAR GIRI) लेखा सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्यानयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER चेन्नई/Chennai, ददनांक/Dated: 23rd July, 2025. KB/- 1. अपीलार्थी/Appellant & SA/Chny/2025 (AY 2021-22) The Chennai Gov & GOV Undertakings Emp Coop Society Limited 2. प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent 3. आयकरआयुक्त/CIT, Chennai / Madurai / Salem / Coimbatore. 4. विभागीयप्रविविवि/DR 5. गार्डफाईल/GF
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026