PRAKASH RAMAN ,VADODARA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION WARD 2 (1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue is covered by previous decisions. While the assessee provided a Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) from the US as additional evidence, the Assessing Officer needs to verify its genuineness.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a non-resident, earned salary income from services rendered in the USA. The Assessing Officer taxed this income in India as it was paid by an Indian employer and received in India. The CIT(A) upheld this.
What were the issues?
Whether salary earned outside India for services rendered outside India by a non-resident is taxable in India, and whether benefits under the India-USA DTAA can be claimed without a timely filed TRC.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Avtar Singh Wadhwan53 citing115 Taxmann 536 · 2001 · HC
- DIT (International Taxation) v. PrahladVijendra Rao42 citing198 Taxmann 551 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. AP Kalyanakrishnan8 citing195 ITR 534 · 1992 · HC
- Ranjit Kumar Bose v. ITO8 citing18 ITD 230 · 1986 · ITAT
- DIT (International Taxation) v. Prahlad Vijendra Rao6 citing390 ITR 109 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Nippon5 citing233 ITR 158 · 1998 · HC
- 396 ITR 406 (Calcutta) 2. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) v. Prahlad Vijendra Rao3 citing10 Taxmann.com 238 · 2011 · HC
- Bholanath Pal v. ITO3 citing23 Taxmann.com 177 · 2012 · ITAT
- DIT (International Taxation) vs. Prahlad Vijendra Rao (2011) 239 CTR 107 (Kar.); Utanka Roy v. DIT3 citing147 ITD 409 · 2014 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & HON’BLE SHRI JAGADISH
MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) [‘CIT(A)’ in short], Chennai-16 dated 10.10.2024 for AY-2019-20. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
Re.: Taxability of salary income earned outside Ind
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 5
- Sarmistha Dey, Hooghly, West Bengal vs Income Tax Officer Ward 24(1), Hoogly…ITA 2864/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Sarmistha Dey, Hooghly, West Bengal vs Income Tax Officer Ward 24(1), Hoogly…ITA 2863/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Jiban Kumar Saha, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2851/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Jiban Kumar Saha, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2850/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Subhasish Bhattacharya, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2849/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026