M3M INDIA PVT.LTD.,GURGAON vs. JCIT OSD TDS CIRCLE, GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
For AY 2017-18, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, following a Delhi High Court decision that Section 194I was not applicable to EDC payments. For subsequent AYs, the Tribunal remanded the matters to the AO to verify if the conditions of the first proviso to Section 201(1) were met.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, engaged in real estate development, deposited External Development Charges (EDC) without deducting TDS. The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated proceedings under Section 201(1)/201(1A) for non-deduction of TDS on EDC payments, invoking Sections 194I and 194C.
What were the issues?
Whether TDS was required to be deducted on External Development Charges (EDC) payments, and if not, whether the assessee could be held in default under Section 201(1)/201(1A) if the payee had complied with return filing and tax payment obligations.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT663 citing327 ITR 456 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT576 citing293 ITR 226 · 2007 · SC
- M/s Puri Construction Private Limited v. Addl. CIT & Ors.42 citing159 Taxmann.com 444 · 2024 · HC
- DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint CIT8 citing459 ITR 773 · 2023 · HC
- JIT (OSD) v. DLF Home Panchkula (P) Ltd.8 citing161 Taxmann.com 237 · 2024 · SC
- 181 Taxmann.com 7715 citing181 Taxmann.com 771 · 2025 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH, DELHI
Before: SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
These are appeals preferred by the Assessee against the orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (hereinafter referred to as the P a g e | 2 5 Appeals ITA No.5431 to 5434 & 5660/Del/2024 M/s M3M India Pvt. Ltd. (AY: 2017-18 to 2021-22)
First Appellate Authority or ‘the ld. FAA’ for short) in appeals filed before
him against the orders of the ld. Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO, for
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 201(1)
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- Tmw Fintech Private Limited, Mumbai vs Circle 14(1)(2), MumbaiITA 30/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- State Bank of India, Guna vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, GwaliorITA 432/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- State Bank of India Regional Business… vs Income Tax Officer, TDS Gwalior, GwaliorITA 420/AGR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- State Bank of India, Tikamgarh vs Income Tax Officer, TDS ITO (TDS) Gwalior…ITA 411/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026