AA 293 PANAHALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), ERODE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reasons provided by the assessee for the delay in filing the appeals were reasonable. For ITA Nos. 2020 & 2021/Chny/2025, the Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to condone the delay and decide the issues on merits, subject to a payment of Rs. 10,000/-. For ITA No. 2022/Chny/2025, the Tribunal found non-compliance with statutory notices and sustained the penalty, dismissing the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed three appeals against orders related to disallowance of deduction under Section 80P, penalty under Section 270A, and penalty under Section 272(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals were delayed, and the CIT(A) dismissed them due to the delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned, and whether the penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) is sustainable due to non-compliance with statutory notices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 270A,Section 272(1)(d),Section 144,Section 144B,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 272A(1),Section 131,Section 142,Section 143
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunatha
PER BENCH: These three appeals filed by the assessee are directed against separate orders all dated 27.06.2025 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], Delhi for the assessment year 2020-21 towards disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short], levy of penalty under section 27
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026