DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CICLE-3(3), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. BOMBAY MINERALS LIMITED, GUJARAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal for AY 2016-17, allowing deduction for scientific research expenditure under Section 37(1) but not the weighted deduction. The Revenue's appeal for AY 2016-17 was dismissed. The assessee's appeal for AY 2018-19 was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Bombay Minerals Ltd., appealed against additions made under Section 14A and the Revenue appealed against deletions made by the CIT(A) regarding notional interest and scientific research expenditure. The appeals for AY 2016-17 and 2018-19 were heard together.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the allowability of expenditure on scientific research reports and the disallowance of notional interest on investments made from interest-free funds.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 36(1)(iii),Section 35(1)(i),Section 35(2AB),Section 37(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.2,118 citing313 ITR 340 · 2009 · HC
- CIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd.1,261 citing366 ITR 505 · 2014 · HC
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.882 citing165 ITD 27 · 2017 · ITAT
- 692 and Reliance Power Ltd. v. DCIT7 citing159 Taxmann.com 1626 · 2024 · ITAT
- J. B. Advani & Co. Ltd. v. CIT7 citing13 ITR 340 · 1945 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM
The captioned appeal appeals by the assessee and the Revenue are by the assessee and the Revenue are directed against separate order directed against separate orders, passed by t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026