SIDDHARATHA PATTINA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITA,BELLARY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, HOSPET
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the E-stamping commission from non-members was a minor fraction of the total income and did not disentitle the assessee from the deduction. It further held that interest income from deposits made to meet statutory requirements was operational income and eligible for deduction.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on its net profit which included interest income from deposits with a cooperative bank and commission from E-Stamps. The AO disallowed the entire deduction due to transactions with non-members and interest from deposits.
What were the issues?
Whether income from E-stamping commission from non-members and interest from statutory deposits are eligible for deduction under Section 80P despite the principle of mutuality.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO1,283 citing322 ITR 283 · 2010 · SC
- Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Co-op. Ltd. v. ITO267 citing55 Taxmann.com 447 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Bankipur Club Ltd.125 citing92 Taxmann 278 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Kumbakonam Mutual Benefit Fund Ltd.19 citing53 ITR 241 · 1964 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K
PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Noida dated 04/10/2024 in DIN No. ITBA/ NFAC/ S/250/2024-25/106938591(1) for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. The assessee has raised as many as 5 grounds of appeal, however the issue raised in ground Nos. 1 to 5 are interconnected and pertain to disallowances of deduction claimed under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act.
The facts in brief are that the assessee is a cooperative society registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act (here after the KCSA) engaged in the business of providing credit facil
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026