PERURCHETTIPALAYAM PACCS,COIMBATORE vs. ITO, NCW-4(2), COIMBATORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest earned from investments in a cooperative bank is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, following the jurisdictional High Court's decisions. The AO's disallowance was therefore incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Primary Agricultural Co-op. Credit Society, claimed deduction under Section 80P for interest income earned from investments in the Coimbatore District Central Co-op. Bank. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, treating the interest as income from other sources.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a cooperative society from investments in a cooperative bank is eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO1,283 citing322 ITR 283 · 2010 · SC
- Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO486 citing188 Taxmann 282 · 2010 · SC
- Thorapadi Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. v. ITO12 citing296 Taxmann 250 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter
referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated 24.09.2025 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2016-17, 2017-18,
2018-19 & 2020-21 respectively. Both the parties agreed that the sole
issue permeating in all the four appeals a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026