DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1) & TPS, MANGALURU vs. NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY, MANGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A was to be re-examined. The deduction under Section 80IA was allowed based on previous judgments in the assessee's own case. The TDS mismatch issue was remitted back to the AO.
What were the facts?
The assessee, New Mangalore Port Authority, claimed deductions under Section 14A and Section 80IA. The Assessing Officer disallowed these claims, leading to additions to the total income. The assessee also reported a mismatch in TDS.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A and the eligibility for deduction under Section 80IA, along with a TDS mismatch.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Sitaldas Tirathdas146 citing41 ITR 367 · 1961 · SC · Read judgment
- Somaiya Organo Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT27 citing216 ITR 291 · 1995 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI. LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI. SOUNDARARAJAN K
Per Bench :
These cross appeals are filed by the Revenue and assessee against the separate Orders passed by the learned CIT(A)for different Assessment Years as detailed below:
ITA Nos.723 to 727/Bang/2025 482 to 486/Bang/2025 Sl. ITA No. and DIN and Order No. Issue in
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- New Mangalore Port Authority, Mangalore vs DCIT, Circle-1 & Tps, MangaloreBangalore23 Jul 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on Somaiya Organo Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A was to be re-examined. The deduction under Section 80IA was allowed based on previous judgments in the assessee's own case. The TDS mismatch issue was...
- New Mangalore Port Authority, Mangalore vs DCIT, Circle-1 & Tps, MangaluruBangalore23 Jul 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on Somaiya Organo Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the disallowance under Section 14A was to be reconsidered by the AO. The deduction under Section 80IA was allowed, following a previous decision in the assessee's own case. The TDS mismatch issue w...
- Mumbai International Airport P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT 10(2)(2), MumbaiMumbai10 Jan 2020Partly Allowed
Also relies on Somaiya Organo Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal decided to set aside the issue of leave encashment to the AO for decision after the final outcome of the Supreme Court's ruling. For the issue of depreciation on taxiways and aprons, the Tribunal upheld the ...
- DCIT 8(2), Mumbai vs Mumbai Internaiotnal Airport P.Ltd, MumbaiMumbai13 Nov 2017Partly Allowed
Also relies on Somaiya Organo Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that Development Fees collected by the assessee are in the nature of capital receipts, akin to cess or tax, and not taxable revenue. It also held that disallowance under Section 14A is not sustainable i...
- Loramitra Rath, Kairapari Kotsahi, Tangi vs DCIT (Circle-1(1), CuttackCuttack5 Sept 2024Allowed
Also relies on Somaiya Organo Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that since the assessee did not receive any sale consideration, no capital gains could be levied. The takeover of properties by the lender to recover its dues was considered an application of income at ...
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
