M/S. VIJAYA BANK,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LTU, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that payments made to NPCI for ATM charges are not covered under Section 194J as technical services, following Supreme Court and co-ordinate bench decisions. It also upheld the deletion of disallowance of depreciation on HTM securities, following previous ITAT and High Court rulings.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a public sector bank, appealed against an assessment order. The Assessing Officer made various additions, including disallowances related to provisions for bad debts, expenditure under Section 40(a)(ia), and depreciation on HTM securities. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether payments for ATM charges to NPCI are subject to TDS under Section 194J, and whether depreciation on HTM securities is allowable. The issue of disallowance under Section 14A was remanded for fresh examination.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 36(1)(vii),Section 40(a)(ia),Section 14A,Section 194J,Section 115JB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- UCO Bank v. CIT486 citing237 ITR 889 · 1999 · SC
- Vijaya Bank v. CIT392 citing323 ITR 166 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Southern Technologies Ltd. v. JCIT353 citing320 ITR 577 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- United Commercial Bank v. CIT314 citing240 ITR 355 · 1999 · SC
- CIT v. Kotak Securities Ltd.203 citing67 Taxmann.com 356 · 2016 · SC · Read judgment
- 33 SOT 7 (Bang- Trib), DCIT Vs Karur Vysya Bank (2005) 273 ITR 510 ( Madras), CIT v. Nedungadi Bank Ltd.63 citing356 ITR 549 · 2013 · HC
- ING Vysya Bank v. CIT17 citing208 Taxmann 511 · 2012
- 323 ITR 1608 citing323 ITR 160
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K. & SHRI B.R. BASKARAN
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These cross appeals are directed against the order dated 27-03-2018 passed by Ld CIT(A)-14, Bangalore and they relate to the assessment year 2013-14. 2. The assessee is a public sector Bank. Earlier it was known as M/s Vijaya Bank and it has sin
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(vii)
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- ITO-41.3.4, Mumbai vs Urmila Syntex, MumbaiITA 2458/MUM/2026[2013]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026
- Dar Housing Limited, Nct of Delhi vs DCIT Central Circle- 15, DelhiITA 1881/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Small Industries Development Bank of India…ITA 870/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Small Industries Development Bank of India… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 9170/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026