M/S. CPV ENGINEER PRIVATE LIMTIED ,HUBBALII vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), HUBBALLI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that sales commission paid to family members involved in the company's business was allowable, and notional interest on director's loan was not disallowable if interest-free funds were available. However, the provision for gratuity was confirmed as disallowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee company paid sales commission to family members of directors and gratuity. The Assessing Officer disallowed these expenses, and the CIT(A) upheld the disallowances. The assessee also took a loan from a director, and notional interest was disallowed.
What were the issues?
Whether sales commission paid to directors' family members and notional interest on director's loan are allowable expenses. Whether provision for gratuity is allowable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
Per Prashant Maharishi, Vice President
ITA No.1486/Bang/2024 is filed by CPV Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (the assessee/appellant) for the assessment year 2014-15 against the appellate order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) [ld. CIT(A)] dated 14.6.2024 wherein the appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income-
ITA Nos. 1486 & 1487/Bang/2024 tax Act, 1961 [the Act] dated 22.12.2016 by the ITO, Ward 1[1], Hubballi was party allowed. Therefore assessee is in appeal before us raising the following grounds:-
“1. The orders of the authori
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(v)
- DCIT, Jabalpur vs Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, SeoniITA 161/JAB/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Nivoda LLP, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Aayakar…ITA 6620/MUM/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2026AY 2022-2023
- Sri Ganganagar Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari… vs ITO Ward-1, HanumangarhITA 788/JODH/2025[2022-23]Status: Heard10 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Sri Ganganagar Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari… vs ITO Ward-1, HanumangarhITA 787/JODH/2025[2020-21]Status: Heard10 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Sri Ganganagar Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari… vs ITO Ward-1, HanumangarhITA 786/JODH/2025[2018-19]Status: Heard10 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026