DCIT, JABALPUR vs. JILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT, SEONI
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an order of the NFAC which deleted additions made by the AO. The additions were primarily on account of disallowance of provisions for overdue interest on NPAs, standard assets, and gratuity.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issues concerning disallowance of provisions for overdue interest and standard assets were decided by a coordinate bench and upheld by the High Court and Supreme Court, thus attained finality. However, the disallowance of provision for gratuity was set aside for verification by the AO.
What were the issues?
Whether provisions for overdue interest on NPAs and standard assets are allowable deductions, and whether provisions for gratuity are admissible under Section 40A(7) without proper substantiation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 43D,Section 36(1)(via),Section 37,Section 40A(7),Section 36(1)(v)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, MP
Before: HON’BLE SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI
PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI; The first appellate DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-
25/1067807296(1) dt. 21/08/2024 passed by National Faceless
Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Ld. NFAC’] u/s 250 of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 [‘the Act’] which dealt with assessment order dt.
15/10/2018 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act by the Asstt.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle Chindwada[‘Ld. AO’] for assessment year 2016-17 [‘AY’], by present appeal is challenged by the Revenue u/s 253(2) of the Act.
ITAT-Jabalpur Jilla Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Vs ACIT ITA No. 161/JAB/2024 AY: 2016-17
Succinctly stated fact
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43D
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-Parwanoo, Parwanoo vs Jogindra Central Co-Operative Bank Limited…ITA 123/CHANDI/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Income Tax Officer, Parwanoo vs Jogindra Central Co-Operative Bank Limited…ITA 119/CHANDI/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2013-14
- Income Tax Officer, Parwanoo vs Jogindera Central Co-Operative Bank…ITA 118/CHANDI/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2012-13
- M/S. Sumathi Bai Industrial Finance India… vs DCIT, CC-3(1), ChennaiITA 3279/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed26 May 2026AY 2020-21
- Sumathi Bai Industrial Finance India Ltd… vs DCIT, Corp. Circle-3(1), ChennaiITA 3278/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed26 May 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smti Gollo Sarah vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 8 Oct 2026
- Abhiram Ayodhyanath Swami vs. Union Of INDIA, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 8 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Balaram Halder vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026