INCOME TAX OFFICER, PARWANOO vs. JOGINDRA CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, NEAR THODO GROUND, SOLAN
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative bank, claimed deductions for provisions for non-performing assets (NPAs) and accrued interest on NPAs. The Assessing Officer disallowed these claims, alleging excess provisions or non-applicability of certain sections. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted these additions, finding the assessee's claims to be less than eligible amounts or in line with RBI guidelines and judicial precedents.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding that the assessee's claims for deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) were less than the eligible amounts. It also affirmed the deletion of additions related to accrued interest on NPAs, following High Court rulings on the retrospective applicability of Section 43D to cooperative banks and the recognition of interest on a receipt basis.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was eligible for deductions for provisions made for NPAs and accrued interest on NPAs, and whether Section 43D applied to cooperative banks for taxing interest on NPAs.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 36(1)(viia),Section 144,Section 147,Section 43D,Section 80P(2)(c)(ii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
Before: HON’BLE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeals by revenue for Assessment Years (AYs) 2012- 13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 arises out of separate orders of learned first
appellate authority. First, we take up
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(viia)
- M/S Malwa Gramin Bank Now Known As Punjab… vs DCIT, SangrurITA 283/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S the Malwa Gramin Bank, Sangrur vs ACIT, Circle, SangrurITA 1181/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S the Malwa Gramin Bank, Sangrur vs Dy Commissioner of Income Tax, SangrurITA 156/CHANDI/2017[2011-12]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank, Jodhpur vs DCIT, Circle-1, JaipurITA 1248/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- State Bank of India, Mumbai vs ACIT-Circle- 2(2)(1), MumbaiITA 3429/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026