SCAN HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-22(2), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6168/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 February 2021AY 2016-172 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal deleted the disallowance under Section 14A as it was made without jurisdiction in a limited scrutiny case. The disallowance of car running expenses was also deleted as the revenue failed to prove the personal nature of the expenses.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order. The appeal involved disallowance under Section 14A and disallowance of car running and entertainment expenses.

What were the issues?

Whether disallowance under Section 14A is permissible in a limited scrutiny case without conversion to full scrutiny. Whether car running expenses can be disallowed on an ad-hoc basis without proving personal nature.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI

Before: Ms. Suchitra KambleDr. B. R. R. Kumar

Hearing: 16.02.2021Pronounced: 18.02.2021

Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:

1.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-8, New Delhi dated 18.06.2019.

2.

Regarding the disallowance u/s 14A, the assessee at the outset argued that this is not a parameter to be examined in the case of limited scrutiny pertaining to the assessee as per the notice issued dated 18.07.2017. There was no proof on record that the limited scrutiny case has been converted into full scrutiny on obtaining the approval of the ld. PCIT as per the instant instructions issued by the CBDT.

2 Scan Holdings Pvt. Ltd. 3. Since, the disallowance u/s 14A determined by the ld. CIT (A) of Rs.68,137/- is without jurisdiction mandated, we hereby delete the addition made by the AO.

4.

With regard to the disallowance on account of car running expenses and entertainment expenses (additional grounds). The ld. AR argued that there cannot be any expenses of personal element in case of the company. He argued that the disallowance of expenses of Rs.1,53,051/- on account of car running and Rs.24,657/- on account of entertainment expenses cannot be treated as personal expenses. Regarding the entertainment expenses being a factual issue of disallowance of Rs.24,657/- forgone by the assessee earlier, owing to any valid reasons, we decline to admit this ground at this juncture.

5.

Having gone through the record, we find that revenue has not brought anything to prove the personal nature of the expenses with regard to car maintenance expenses except disallowing the same on adhoc basis. Hence, the action of the revenue cannot be supported. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 18/02/2021.

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →