DCIT 7(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. GOLDMAN SACHS (INDIA) SECURITIES P.TL, MUMBAI

ITA 1546/MUM/2015Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 February 2022AY 2010-1166 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee's appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue's appeal is dismissed. Specific findings on transfer pricing adjustments and ESOP expenses were upheld or modified.

What were the facts?

The case involves cross-appeals by the assessee and the revenue concerning the assessment year 2010-11. The primary dispute revolves around transfer pricing adjustments for investment advisory/support services, IT-enabled services, and broking services, as well as the allowability of Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) expenses.

What were the issues?

The key issues include the correctness of transfer pricing adjustments made by the TPO, the rejection of comparables, the method of computing ALP, and the allowability of ESOP expenses as a deduction.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 144C(3),Section 37(1),Section 133(6),Section 234B,Section 234C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “K”, MUMBAI

Before: MRS. DIVA SINGH & SHRI RIFAUR RAHMAN&

Hearing: 25.11.2021Pronounced: 17.02.2022

PER DIVA SINGH, J.M:

These are cross appeals filed by the Assessee and the Revenue pertaining to 2010-11 assessment year assailing the Goldman Sachs (India) Securities P.Ltd. V DCIT ITA NO.1115 & 1546/MUM/2015 (A.Y.2010-11) assessment order dated 28.01.2015 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.

144C(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 wherein the parties are

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 144C(3)

All 595 judgments and leading authorities on Section 144C(3) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →