DCIT 7(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. GOLDMAN SACHS (INDIA) SECURITIES P.TL, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue's appeal is dismissed. Specific findings on transfer pricing adjustments and ESOP expenses were upheld or modified.
What were the facts?
The case involves cross-appeals by the assessee and the revenue concerning the assessment year 2010-11. The primary dispute revolves around transfer pricing adjustments for investment advisory/support services, IT-enabled services, and broking services, as well as the allowability of Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) expenses.
What were the issues?
The key issues include the correctness of transfer pricing adjustments made by the TPO, the rejection of comparables, the method of computing ALP, and the allowability of ESOP expenses as a deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(3),Section 37(1),Section 133(6),Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. Jai Parabolic Springs Ltd.349 citing306 ITR 42 · 2008 · HC · Read judgment
- Rampgreen Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT196 citing377 ITR 533 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Indian Express (Madurai) Pvt. Ltd.93 citing13 Taxmann 441 · 1983 · HC
- Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. ACIT33 citing124 TTJ 771 · 2009 · ITAT
- CIT v. Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Pvt. Ltd.19 citing69 Taxmann.com 19 · 2016 · HC
- (CIT v. Carlyle India Advisors (P.) Ltd.12 citing32 Taxmann.com 23 · 2013 · HC
- Income (CIT v. General Atlantic (P.) Ltd.8 citing68 Taxmann.com 88 · 2016 · HC
- 214 Taxmann 4926 citing214 Taxmann 492
- Carlyle India Advisors Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax6 citing24 Taxmann.com 176 · 2012
- 424 ITR 5633 citing424 ITR 563 · 2020 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “K”, MUMBAI
Before: MRS. DIVA SINGH & SHRI RIFAUR RAHMAN&
PER DIVA SINGH, J.M:
These are cross appeals filed by the Assessee and the Revenue pertaining to 2010-11 assessment year assailing the Goldman Sachs (India) Securities P.Ltd. V DCIT ITA NO.1115 & 1546/MUM/2015 (A.Y.2010-11) assessment order dated 28.01.2015 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.
144C(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 wherein the parties are
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(3)
- Radhakishan Potharajula, Karim Nagar vs ITO (Int Taxn)-2, HyderabadITA 2340/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Neha Hiranand Motwani, Nashik vs ITO International Tax, NashikITA 1570/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Atc Tires Private Limited, Mumbai vs The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 6468/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026