DCIT, CHENNAI vs. CENTURY FLOUR MILLS LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not pressed/maintainable, citing CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 which sets a monetary limit for filing appeals. The issues raised were left open for future examination.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT for the assessment year 2006-07. The tax effect in this appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT given the tax effect is below the threshold specified in CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE
आदेश / O R D E R PER G. MANJUNATHA, AM: This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)(C)-II, Chennai, dated 31.10.2013 and pertains to assessment year 2006-07.
It is stated before us that the tax effect in the above appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under section 268A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 comes into play, wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the 2 :: Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of the reducing the tax litigation. In the said Circular, it is stated that in case where the tax effect in the appeal to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs, appeal should not be filed. Thus, taking note of CBDT Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeal is left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order, if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of CBDT circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019, this appeal stands dismissed.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026