Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 835/JP/2018
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR Jh fot; ikWy jko] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 835/JP/2018 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2012-13 cuke Asstt. Commissioner of Income- M/s Kanhaiya Lal Vs. tax, Central Circle-3, Rameshwar Das, Kota Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AABFK4323K vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by: Shri J. C. Kulhari (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Rajnikant Bhatra (CA) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 20/08/2018 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 21/08/2018 vkns'k@ ORDER
PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M.
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of ld. CIT (A)- 04, Jaipur dated 04.04.2018 for Assessment Year 2012-13 wherein the Revenue has taken the following grounds of appeal:- “(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 33,23,348/- made by AO on account of Stone Cutting Expenses Malwa Jharai Exp., Tractor Running Exp., & Loading Unloading Expenses.”
(2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,44,740/- made by AO on account of disallowance u/s 36(1)(v).”
2 ITA No. 835/JP/2018 ACIT, Jaipur vs. Ms Kanhaiya Lal Rameshwar Das, Kota 2. The ld. D/R has submitted that the tax effect involved in the
Revenue’s appeal comes to Rs 13,51,060/- less than Rs 20 lacs which is prescribed threshold limit in terms of the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11th
July, 2018 issued in supersession of its earlier Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated
10.12.2015.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on
record. It is observed that the demand/ tax effect in the Revenue’s appeal in question is below Rs. 20.00 lacs. Under the powers vested by section
268A(1) of the IT Act, CBDT has recently issued Circular No. 3/2018 11th dated July, 2018 (F No. 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ(Pt)
instructing the authorities below that departmental appeal should
not be filed before ITAT where the demand/tax effect does not
exceed Rs. 20 lacs. The circular is specifically mentioned to be applicable for
all pending appeals.
Subject to some exceptions, it is further directed by CBDT that all the
departmental appeals pending before ITAT where the demand/tax effect is
not exceeding than 20 lacs should be either withdrawn or not pressed by the
departmental representatives.
The present appeal is not covered by any exceptions mentioned in the
said CBDT circular. Since the tax demand in dispute in this departmental
appeal is below the limit set out by CBDT for the appeal, the appeal of the
assessee is not maintainable in view of CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated
11.07.2018. Accordingly the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as not
pressed/withdrawn.
3 ITA No. 835/JP/2018 ACIT, Jaipur vs. Ms Kanhaiya Lal Rameshwar Das, Kota In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 21/08/2018. Sd/- Sd/- ¼fot; ikWy jko½ ¼foØe flag ;kno½ (Vijay Pal Rao) (Vikram Singh Yadav) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 21/08/2018 *Ganesh Kr. आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- ACIT, Central Circle-03, Jaipur 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- M/s Kanhaiya Lal Rameshwar Das, Kota 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 4. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT(A) 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत. 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File { ITA No. 835/JP/2018} vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order, सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत