M/S NASA AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,FAZILKA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE- II, BATHINDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 14A cannot be invoked if the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the relevant assessment year. Since the assessee admittedly earned no exempt income, the disallowance made under Section 14A was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The Assessing Officer made a disallowance, which the CIT(A) partly upheld, affirming a disallowance of Rs. 2,29,812/-.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A is permissible when the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the assessment year.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing378 ITR 33 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Hero Cycles Ltd.470 citing323 ITR 518 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd.444 citing80 Taxmann.com 221 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Winsome Textile Industries Ltd.378 citing319 ITR 204 · 2009 · HC
- CIT v. Lakhani Marketing Inc.145 citing49 Taxmann.com 257 · 2014 · HC
- JCIT v. Holland Equipment Co. B.V30 citing3 SOT 810 · 2005 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: SH. N.S.SAINI & SH. N.K.CHOUDHRY
PER N.K.CHOUDHRY, JM: The aforesaid appeals have been preferred by the Assessee/Appellant against the order dated 25.05.2017 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-Bathinda, u/s 250(6) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as ‘the Act’).
In both the appeals the issue is identical and similar therefore for the sake of convenience and brevity have been taken into consideration simultaneously and facts of the ITA No.536/Asr/2017 shall be quoted in the order and result of the same shall mutatis mutandis apply to ITA No.537/Asr/2017. 3. The assessee has raised the following ground in ITA No.536/Asr/2017 which is as under: “On the facts & circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026