AMRAPALI LEISURE VALLEY PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. JCIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that no proceedings can continue against the corporate debtor (assessee) due to the insolvency proceedings. Section 238 of the Code overrides other statutes, including the Income-tax Act, and all claims must be dealt with under the Code.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by both the Revenue and the assessee concerning the Amrapali Group. It was brought to the Tribunal's notice that the Amrapali Group is undergoing insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
What were the issues?
Whether income tax proceedings can continue against a corporate debtor undergoing insolvency proceedings. The applicability of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code over the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR
PER BENCH :
Aforesaid appeals have been filed by the Revenue and the assessee challenging the impugned orders passed by the ld. CIT (A) pertaining to Amrapali Group.
During the hearing, it has come on record by virtue of the order dated 17.03.2021 passed by the coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in 1949, 1950 & 1951/Del/2017 in ACIT vs. M/s. Amrapali & Silicon Pvt. Ltd. & other appeals that Amrapali Group to which these appeals belong has gone into insolvency proceedings in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short ‘the Code’).
In view of the matter, we are of the considered view that since Amrapali Group is already undergoing insolvency proceedings under the Code in which resolution professionals have already been appointed, no proceedings can continue against the corporate debtor i.e. assessee under section 14 of the Code.
Likewise, section 238 of the Code will have overriding effect on all other Central and State statutes including the Income-tax Act and all the claims including claim of the assessee as well as Revenue Department shall be entertained in accordance with the Code.
Consequently, all the aforesaid appeals filed by the Revenue and assessee are hereby dismissed with liberty to the Revenue as well resolution process under the Code. Order pronounced in open court on this 8th day of April, 2021 after the conclusion of the virtual hearing.
More judgments on Section 14
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 2/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 1/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Narayan Industries Global Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT Circle 16(1), DelhiITA 8422/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Manpreet Estates LLP, Mumbai vs ACIT, Central Circle 8(3), MumbaiITA 4386/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026