ABB INDIA LTD.,BENGALURU vs. ADDL.C.I.T, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the provision for warranty expenses as a deduction, following its own previous orders. For Section 14A, it deleted the disallowance related to interest expenditure as the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds, and restored the disallowance related to other expenses to the AO for re-determination.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed provision for warranty expenses and deduction under Section 14A. The Assessing Officer made disallowances for both. The CIT(A) granted partial relief on Section 14A disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether provision for warranty expenses is allowable as a deduction and the correctness of disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Bharat Earth Movers v. CIT901 citing245 ITR 428 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.882 citing165 ITD 27 · 2017 · ITAT
- Berger Paints India Ltd. v. CIT181 citing135 Taxmann 586 · 2004 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Microlabs Ltd.175 citing383 ITR 490 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. HCL Technologies Ltd.174 citing404 ITR 719 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Rotork Controls India Ltd.34 citing293 ITR 311 · 2007 · HC
- ACIT v. ABB Limited4 citing14 SOT 18 · 2007 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “C”, BANGALORE
Before: Shri George George K, JM & Ms.Padmavathy S, AM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per George George K, JM : These cross appeal are directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 30.09.2013. The relevant assessment year is 2008- 2009. We shall adjudicate the assessee’s appeal first.
Eight grounds are raised in the memorandum of appeal. Ground 1 is general in nature and no specific adjudication is called for, hence, the same is dismissed. Grounds 6, 7 and 8 are conse
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026