ADDL CIT RG 10(2), MUMBAI vs. GEOMETRIC SOFTWAR SOLUTIONS CO. LTD, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the lease rent income should be taxed as income from house property, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision. Regarding Section 14A, the disallowance made under Rule 8D was deleted as the rule was not applicable for the A.Y. 2005-06, but a disallowance of Rs. 1 lakh was upheld based on previous years' orders. The addition to book profit under Section 115JB for Section 14A disallowance was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Geometric Software Solutions Company Ltd., appealed against the CIT(A)'s order concerning A.Y. 2005-06. The appeal involved issues related to Section 10A deduction, lease rent classification, Section 14A disallowance, and transfer pricing adjustments.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the correct head of income for lease rent, the applicability and computation of Section 14A disallowance, and the treatment of such disallowance for book profit computation under Section 115JB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10A,Section 14A,Section 115JB,Section 56(2)(iii),Section 92C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd.290 citing391 ITR 274 · 2017 · SC · Read judgment
- ITO v. Daga Capital Management (P) Ltd.151 citing117 ITD 169 · 2009 · ITAT
- CIT v. Shambhu Investment Pvt. Ltd.57 citing249 ITR 47 · 2001 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “K” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM: Geometric software solutions co. ltd; A.Y. 05–06
These are the Cross appeals filed in case of Geometric Software Solutions Company Ltd. now merged with HCL Technologies Limited (the appellant/ assessee), fil
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026