OMKARA CO.OPERATIVE HOUSING SOC. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 19(1) (1), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's accounts were required to be audited under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. For such assessees, the due date for filing the return was extended to October 31, 2019. Since the return was filed before this extended due date, the disallowance was incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative housing society, claimed a deduction under section 80P. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim because the return was filed after the due date of August 31, 2019. The CIT(A) confirmed this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of deduction under Section 80P was justified when the return was filed after the initial due date but within the extended due date for audited entities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” Bench, Mumbai
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 30.3.3022 passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi and it relates to A.Y. 2019- 20. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of learned CIT(A) in confirming the disallowance of claim of Rs. 2,32,662/- made under section 80P of the I.T. Act while processing return filed by the assessee.
The Learned AR submitted that the assessee is a cooperative housing society and it filed its return of income for A.Y. 2019-20 on 19.9.2019, wherein it claimed deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act to the tune of Rs.2,32,662/-. The Assessing Officer (CPC), while proceeding return under section 143(1) of the Act, took the due date of filing of the return of income for the year under consideration as 31.8.2019. Since the return of income was filed by the assessee on 19.9.2019, i.e. beyond the due date prescribed under section 139(1), deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P of the Act was disallowed by CPC and the same was also confirmed by learned CIT(A).
2 Omkara Cooperative Housing Society Ltd.
The Learned AR submitted that the accounts of the assessee is required to be audited by a Chartered Accountant as per section 81 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Society Act, 1960. He further submitted that the due date of filing of return of income under section 139(1) of the Act, in respect of the persons whose account are required to be audited under the Income Tax Act or under any other law was 30th September 2019 for the year under consideration. He further submitted that the due date of filing return of income for such kind of assessees was extended by the CBDT to 31st October, 2019, vide its letter dated 27.9.2019. Accordingly, the learned AR submitted that the due date for filing return of income for the assessee for the year under consideration was 31st October 2019 and the assessee has filed return of income on 19.9.2019, i.e., very much before the due date. Accordingly he submitted that the Assessing Officer was not justified in disallowing deduction claimed under section 80P of the Act.
The Learned DR, on the contrary, supported the order passed by learned CIT(A).
Having heard the rival submissions, I find merit in the contentions of the assessee. I noticed that as per section 81 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Society Act, 1960, the account of the assessee is required to be audited. In respect of assessees whose accounts are required to be audited in any other law also, due date for filing the return of income under section 139(1) is 30th September 2019, which has been extended to 31st October 2019 for AY 2019- 20. I noticed that the Assessing Officer has taken the due date for filing the return of income for the assessee for the year under consideration as 31.8.2019, which is not in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Since the assessee has filed return of income within the due date prescribed under section 139(1) of the Act, I am of the view that the tax authorities are not justified in denying the claim under section 80P of the Act. Accordingly, I set
3 Omkara Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. aside the order passed by learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to allow deduction under section 80P of the Act as claimed by the assessee.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 17.08.2022.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026