DCIT CIR 4 (2)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S QUANT SECURITIES PVT LTD., MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's case falls under the exception clause of Explanation to Section 73 of the Income Tax Act, as its gross total income mainly comprised income from other sources. Therefore, the loss on shares and derivatives could not be treated as speculative loss.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a share broker, incurred a loss of Rs 1,13,24,176/- from trading in shares and derivatives. The Assessing Officer treated this loss as speculative loss and disallowed it, apportioning expenses accordingly. The CIT(A) granted relief to the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the share trading loss is speculative loss, and if the exception under Explanation to Section 73 of the IT Act is applicable to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Darshan Securities (P) Ltd.27 citing18 Taxmann.com 142 · 2012 · HC
- 142 (Bombay) and CIT v. HSBC Securities and Capital Markets India Private Limited13 citing23 Taxmann.com 377 · 2012 · HC
- Eastern Aviation & Industries Ltd. v. CIT12 citing208 ITR 1023 · 1994 · HC
- CIT v. Parkview Properties Pvt. Ltd.8 citing261 ITR 473 · 2003 · HC
- CIT v. Pangal Vithal Nayak & Co. Pvt Ltd.4 citing74 ITR 754 · 1969 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI M.BALAGANESH
PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in ITA No.7756/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2014-15 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-9/Cir-4/349/2016-17 dated 31/10/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 26/12/2016 by the ld. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax-4(2)(1), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
2 M/s. Quant Securities Pvt. Ltd.,
The only issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the ld. CIT(A) was justified in treating the share trading loss as not speculative loss on the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 73
- The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Nk Proteins Pvt. LtdTAXAP/449/20254 Aug 2026
- Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai vs Motilal Oswal Financial Services Limited…ITA 7971/MUM/2025[2014]Status: Disposed7 Jul 2026
- Trinity Opportunity Fund I, Mauritius vs Assessing Officer-Int Tax Circle 4(1)(2)…ITA 3140/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed15 Jun 2026AY 2023-24
- ITO, Parel, Mumbai vs Kunal Govind Kataria, MumbaiITA 2125/MUM/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed22 May 2026AY 2010-11
- Kpa Apparels Private Limited, Delhi vs Income Tax Officer Ward 14(3), DelhiITA 2798/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 May 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026