KPA APPARELS PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 14(3), DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment order was revised by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263, citing alleged violations of Section 269SS and 269T of the Income Tax Act based on audit objections. The PCIT believed the assessment order was passed without proper inquiry and was prejudicial to the revenue.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted proper inquiries and verification during the assessment proceedings. Therefore, the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT correctly invoked Section 263 powers to revise an assessment order passed after due inquiry by the AO, and whether the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 269SS,Section 271D,Section 269T,Section 271E,Section 73,Section 185
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’: NEW DELHI
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM: This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-4 [ld. PCIT, in short] dated 17.03.2025 in Revision No. PCIT, Delhi-4/Revision-263/100000777938/2025 passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) revising the Assessment Order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 17.09.2022 for AY 2020-
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the order dated 17.03.2025, passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-4 ['Ld. PCIT'], under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') setting aside the assessment to be
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S Rajguru Foods, BijapurITA 77/PAN/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Vadodara vs The Pr. CIT, Vadodara-1, VadodaraITA 1066/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Vadodara vs The Pr. CIT, Vadodara-1, VadodaraITA 1065/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Zabuben Mepabhai Bharvad, Ahmedabad vs The PCIT - 1, AhmedabadITA 1233/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026