DY CIT, CIRCLE-8(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S SIEMENS TECHNOLOGY & SERVICES P. LTD ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS SIEMENS INFORMATION SYSTEMS LTD.), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the disallowance. The assessee had provided documentary evidence to show that each unit was physically separate, had STPI approvals, and maintained separate lines of business and employees, fulfilling the conditions for Section 10A deduction.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance made towards deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act for AY 2003-04 and 2004-05. The AO had disallowed the deduction, alleging that the units were not independent and lacked separate accounts, with overlapping work and resource usage.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's units were independent and eligible for deduction under Section 10A, and if the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the AO's disallowance based on the evidence presented.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Textile Machinery Corporation Ltd. v. CIT165 citing107 ITR 195 · 1977 · SC
- DCIT v. Sankhya Infotech Ltd.5 citing12 Taxmann.com 169 · 2011
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘E‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE&
PER BENCH:
These appeals in ITA No. 286/Mum/2021 & 287/Mum/2021 for A.Y.2003-04 & 2004-05 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 15 Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)15/10829/2019-20, CIT(A)15/10034/2019-20, dated 31/07/2020 & 17/02/2020 respectively (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the M/s. Siemens Technology & Services Pvt Ltd.,
order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 03/04/2012 by the ld. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 7(2), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as l
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026