ACIT CEN CI-43 vs. ROHA DYECHEM P. LTD, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal regarding trip expenses, reducing the disallowance. It also restored the transfer pricing adjustment for interest on loans to the AO/TPO for fresh adjudication. The Revenue's appeal regarding administrative expenses was dismissed due to low tax effect.
What were the facts?
The assessee company engaged in manufacturing and export of colors and dyes filed its return of income. The Assessing Officer made several additions and disallowances, which were partly allowed by the CIT(A). Both the assessee and the Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Key issues included the exclusion of export incentives from eligible profits for deduction, the treatment of net interest income, transfer pricing adjustments on loans and administrative charges, and disallowance of trip expenses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 153A,Section 80IB,Section 80HHC,Section 92CA,Section 92C,Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(17)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.2,118 citing313 ITR 340 · 2009 · HC
- Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT1,695 citing193 ITR 321 · 1992 · SC
- CIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd.1,261 citing366 ITR 505 · 2014 · HC
- Liberty India v. CIT571 citing317 ITR 218 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- HDFC Bank Ltd. v. DCIT408 citing67 Taxmann.com 42 · 2016 · HC
- Pandian Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT353 citing262 ITR 278 · 2003 · SC
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. ITO338 citing124 TTJ 577 · 2009 · ITAT
- CIT v. Sterling Foods311 citing237 ITR 579 · 1999 · SC · Read judgment
- DIT (E) v. Apparel Export Promotion Council193 citing245 ITR 492 · 2000 · HC
- Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT168 citing330 ITR 485 · 2000 · HC
- Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT144 citing194 Taxmann 203 · 2010 · HC
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. Deepak Agarwal11 citing35 Taxmann.com 293 · 2013
- Omkar Textiles Mills Private Limited v. ITO11 citing115 TTJ 716 · 2008 · ITAT
- 34 Taxmann.com 1299 citing34 Taxmann.com 129 · 2013
- Pavak Securities P. Ltd. v. ITO9 citing38 Taxmann.com 387 · 2013
- 62 Taxmann.com 238 citing62 Taxmann.com 23 · 2015 · SC
- Shakti Footware v. ACIT8 citing317 ITR 194
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “K” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI KULDIP SINGH (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2004-05 ACIT CEN CI-43 Mumbai-400 034 PAN No. AAACR 4974P Appellant Respondent
ITA No. 4293, 4294, 4295/MUM/2009 Assessment Year: 2002-03, 2004-05, 2007-08 ACIT CEN CI-43 RohaDyechem Pvt Ltd., 6TH Floor, R.No. 659, Aayakar 12, Abhishek BLDG, Bhavan, M.K.Rd. Vs. 303/307, Samual Street, Mumbai 400 020 Mumbai - 3 PAN No. AAACR 4974 P Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2005-06 RohaDyechem Pvt Ltd., ACIT CEN CI-43 A 44-45, MIDC, 2nd Street, Marol, 6TH Floor, R.No. 659, Anderi (E), Mumbai- 400 092 Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Rd. Mumbai 400 020 PAN No. AAACR 4974 P Appellant Respondent
ITA No. 10,4293, 4294, 4295,2859, 2860, 2861, 2862,2863/MUM/2009, 6015, 5969/MUM/2014,6401/MUM/2008 A.Y. 2002-03, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2009-10 2 Assessment Year: 2009-10 RohaDyechem Pvt Ltd., ACIT CEN CI-43 Plot No. 2, MIDC Andheri (E) 6TH Floor, R.No. 659, Mumbai-400 093 Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Rd
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026