M/S UNITED BREWERIES LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowance under Section 14A cannot be added to book profits for the purpose of Section 115JB, following a jurisdictional High Court ruling. The Tribunal also restored certain issues related to TDS/TCS credit and demand on dividend distribution tax to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification.
What were the facts?
The assessee, United Breweries Limited, filed its return of income for AY 2012-2013. The Assessing Officer made several disallowances and additions, including depreciation on goodwill, disallowance under Section 14A, disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia), and addition on account of brand promotion expenses. The CIT(A) partly allowed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A can be added to book profits under Section 115JB, and the validity of various disallowances made by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 115JB,Section 40(a)(ia),Section 43B,Section 143(3),Section 92CA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(17)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT1,484 citing288 ITR 1 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- Joint Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT803 citing59 Taxmann.com 295 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- Empire Jute Co. Ltd. v. CIT622 citing3 Taxmann 69 · 1980 · SC
- CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd.540 citing348 ITR 302 · 2012 · SC
- Eastern Investments Ltd. v. CIT346 citing38 ITR 601 · 1960 · SC
- Sassoon J. David & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT323 citing118 ITR 261 · 1979 · SC
- ITO v. Ch. Atchaiah149 citing218 ITR 239 · 1996 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Noble and Hewitt (I) P. Ltd.109 citing305 ITR 324 · 2008 · HC · Read judgment
- 69 citing
- Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank v. JCIT64 citing95 Taxmann.com 41 · 2018 · HC · Read judgment
- Ltd. (254 ITR 503), CIT v. Salora International (308 ITR 199) (Del.), CIT v. Casio India Ltd. (52 citing195 Taxmann 256 · 2010 · HC
- CIT v. Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd.46 citing115 ITR 659 · 1978 · HC
- Again, in Sassoon J. David & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. CIT22 citing1 Taxmann 485 · 1979 · SC
- IBM India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (TDS) LTU19 citing59 Taxmann.com 107 · 2015
- Karnataka State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT13 citing76 Taxmann.com 360 · 2016 · ITAT
- Smith Kline & French (India) Ltd. v. CIT13 citing59 Taxmann 357 · 1992 · HC
- CIT v. ITC Hotels11 citing47 Taxmann.com 215 · 2015 · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE
Before: Shri George George K, JM & Ms.Padmavathy S, AM
Per George George K, JM : This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 20.12.2017. The relevant assessment year is 2012-2013. 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The assessee is a limited company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of beer under different brands like “Kingfisher” and “UB”. For the assessment year 2012-2013, the return of income was filed on 30.11.2012 declaring total income at `Nil’ under the regular provisions of the Income-tax Act and book profit of Rs.245,93,47,150 u/s 115JB of the I.T.Act. The return was subsequently revised on 07.02.2014 and the total income of Rs.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026