TITANOR COMPONENTS LTD.) vs. CIT AND ANOTHER
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals, upholding the lower actual cost determined by the Assessing Officer based on the surveyor's report. The High Court found no merit in the assessee's submission that depreciation should be allowed on the actual cost incurred.
What were the facts?
The assessee acquired a running business, including fixed assets, from M/s Wimco Ltd. for a total consideration. The Assessing Officer, relying on a surveyor's report (appointed by the assessee), determined a lower actual cost for these assets than what the assessee claimed.
What were the issues?
Whether the Tribunal was correct in relying on a surveyor's report to determine the actual cost of assets acquired, for the purpose of depreciation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty628 citing307 ITR 75 · 1981 · SC
- Challapalli Sugars Ltd. v. CIT185 citing98 ITR 167 · 1975 · SC
- CIT v. Artex Manufacturing Co.36 citing227 ITR 260 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. Electric Control Gear Manf. Co.26 citing227 ITR 278 · 1997 · SC
- 4 citing
ITA No. 190 & 191/2002 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on August 28, 2014 Judgment delivered on December 22, 2014
+
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 190/2002
DE NORA INDIA LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S
TITANOR COMPONENTS LTD.) ..... Appellant
Through Mr. C.S. Jain and Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Advocates.
versus
CIT AND ANOTHER
..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel & Ms. Swati Thapa, Advocates.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 191/2002
DE NORA INDIA LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S
TITANOR COMPONENTS LTD.)
..... Appellant Through Mr. C.S. Jain and Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Advocates.
versus
CIT AND ANOTHER
..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel & Ms. Swati Thapa, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.
These two appeals filed by the assessee DENORA India Ltd. (earlier known as M/s Titanor
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Doms Industries Ltd, Valsad vs PCIT, ValsadITA 595/SRT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Aeon Formulations Private Limited, Chennai vs Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(1)…ITA 2481/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Fiitjee Limited, Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 9186/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Fiitjee Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 9185/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026