COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT vs. M/S. ARTEX MANUFACTURING COMPANY

CIVIL APPEAL No. 2276/1981Supreme Court1997 INSC 54208 July 1997Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: S.C. AGRAWAL, G.B. PATTANAIK COMMISSIONER OF19 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What were the facts?

The assessee, Artex Manufacturing Company, a partnership firm, sold its artsilk cloth manufacturing business as a going concern to a newly formed private limited company for Rs. 11,50,400, satisfied by shares. The business ceased operations from April 1, 1966. For Assessment Year 1967-68, the assessee initially filed a 'nil' income return, later revised to 'nil' with a note that conversion to a private limited company as a going concern meant no income was chargeable under Sections 41(2) or 45. The Income Tax Officer proposed tax under Section 41(2) on a surplus of Rs. 12,56,020, calculated by deducting the income tax WDV of plant, machinery, and dead stock (Rs. 3,32,276) from the revalued amount (Rs. 15,87,296). The Appellate Assistant Commissioner held the surplus was capital gains, not business income, and the assessee should be taxed as an Association of Persons, not a Registered Firm. The ITAT ruled the surplus was taxable business profit under Section 41(2) and the assessee was a registered firm. The High Court, on reference, held mutuality was not applicable, the surplus was capital gains (not Section 41(2) income), the assessee was an Association of Persons, and entitled to relief under certain circulars, and transfer of a going concern is taxable under Section 45, not Section 41(2). The Revenue appealed to the Supreme Court.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the High Court was not right in holding Section 41(2) inapplicable. The transfer of a going concern is liable to tax under Section 41(2), not Section 45. The Court found that the price attributed to the transferred items (plant, machinery, and dead-stock) was indicated, as the assessee's own valuation of Rs. 15,87,296 was used in arriving at the sale consideration. Therefore, the surplus amount resulting from the transfer of plant, machinery, and dead stock is taxable under Section 41(2), limited to the extent of the difference between the written down value and the actual cost. If the surplus exceeds this difference, the excess is taxable as capital gains under Section 45. The Court agreed with the High Court that the assessee should be taxed as a 'body of individuals' (association of persons), not a 'registered firm'. The Court also held that the two circulars of the CBDT relied upon by the assessee had no application to the case. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal to determine the exact tax liability under Section 41(2) and Section 45, as the High Court's answer on this point was discharged.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the surplus arising from the transfer of plant, machinery, and dead stock is chargeable to tax under Section 41(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, or as capital gains under Section 45. - Assessee's contention: The surplus is not liable to tax due to the principle of mutuality and that the transfer of a going concern is taxable under Section 45, not Section 41(2). - Revenue's contention: The surplus is taxable business profit under Section 41(2). 2. Whether the assessee should be taxed in the status of a 'registered firm' or an 'association of persons'. - Assessee's contention: Taxable as a registered firm. - Revenue's contention: Taxable as an association of persons. 3. Whether the assessee is entitled to relief based on two circulars of the Central Board of Direct Taxes. - Assessee's contention: Entitled to relief under the circulars. - Revenue's contention: The circulars are not applicable.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 41(2),Section 45

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

A COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT v. M/S. ARTEX MANUFACTURING COMPANY JULY 8, 1997 B (S.C. AGRAWAL AND G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961 : Section 41(2) and Section 4!r--Balancing Charge-Sale of Business as C a going concern-Difference between the wlitten down value of plant, machinery and dead stock transferred and sale consideration receive<i--Held, is chargeable to tax under Section 41(2)-Surplus, if any in excess of the said difference taxable as capital gains under Section 45. D The assessee, a partnership firm carrying on the business of manufacturing artsilk cloth, sold its business as a running concern to a private limited company which was formed with a view to take over the business. The sale consideration of Rs. 11,50,400 was paid and satisfied by the allotment of 11,504 fully paid-up equity shares of Rs. 100 each according to the original shares of partners of the assessee. The assessee E ceased to carry on its with effect from 1st April 1966 and in respect of the Assessment year 1967-68, the assessce filed its return showing 'nil' income.

The previous return filed was revised showing 'nil' income with a note that since the partnership

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 41(2)

All 53 judgments and leading authorities on Section 41(2) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →