RNB CARBIDE & FERRO ALLOYS (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), GUWAHATI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 312/GTY/2018Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 December 2019AY 2012-132 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that there was no proof of service of the last hearing notice and no adjudication on merits by the CIT(A). Therefore, the appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for AY 2012-13 was against the CIT(A)'s ex parte order. The CIT(A) had affirmed the Assessing Officer's addition of ₹3,06,44,923/- denying deduction under Section 80IC.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) properly adjudicated the appeal on merits when it was passed ex parte without proper notice and adjudication. The denial of deduction under Section 80IC was also a key issue.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80IC,Section 143(3),Section 250(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GAUHATI BENCH “E” COURT AT KOLKATA

Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

आदेश /O R D E R PER BEMCH:- This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2012-13 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2 Guwahati’s order dated 27.08.2018 passed in case No.Guwa-244/2015-16 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex parte.

2.

Learned departmental representative invites our attention to assessee multiple substantive grievances correctness of both the lower authorities’

ITA No.312/Gau/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s RNB Carbide & Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO,Wd-2(2) Guwa Page 2 denying u/s.80IC deduction of ₹3,06,44,923/- in both the lower proceedings We notice at the outset that the CIT(A) has passed his lower appellate order ex parte whilst affirming the Assessing Officer’s action making addition of ₹3,06,44,923/- in the assessment order dated 30.03.2015. Learned departmental representative fails to dispute that neither there is any indication about the actual service of the last hearing notice in lower appellate proceedings nor is there any adjudication on merits as contemplated u/s.250(6) of the Act. We therefore restore the assessee’s substantive ground back to the CIT(A) for afresh adjudication on merits within three effective opportunities of hearing.

3.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above in above terms. Order pronounced in the open court 13/12/2019 Sd/- Sd/- (A.L.Saini) (S.S.Godara) (Accountant Member) Judicial Member) Kolkata, *Dkp �दनांकः- 13/12/2019 कोलकाता/। आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant-RNB Carbide & Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. C/o Sagarmal Ramkumar Complex, S.R.C.B.Road, Fancy Bazar, Guwahatii-781001 2. ��यथ� /Respondent-ITO Ward-2(2), Aayakar Bhawan, Christian Basti, G.S. Road Guwahati-781005 3. संबं*धत आयकर आयु-त / Concerned CIT Guahati 4. आयकर आयु-त- अपील / CIT (A) Guahati 5. 0वभागीय �3त3न*ध, आयकर अपील�य अ*धकरण, / DR, ITAT, Guahati 6. गाड7 फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से, /True Copy/ Sr. Private Secretary, Head of Office/DDO आयकर अपील�य अ*धकरण, गूवाहाठ� ।

More judgments on Section 80IC

All 1,180 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80IC →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →