SURAJ CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 19(3)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 2347/MUM/2025Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 August 2025AY 2013-14Bench: SMT. BEENA PILLAI ( (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals, citing sufficient cause and the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal held that adjustments made under Section 143(1) without an opportunity of being heard to the assessee were unsustainable.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals against orders by Ld.CIT(A) for multiple assessment years due to delay. The assessee had filed rectification applications under Section 154 which were pending, causing the delay in filing appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeals before the Ld.CIT(A) should be condoned? Whether adjustments made by CPC under Section 143(1) without affording an opportunity of hearing to the assessee are valid?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 154,Section 143(1),Section 143(1)(a),Section 80P,Section 80P(2)(d),Section 143(2)(a)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Shah
For Respondent: Shri Rajesh Sakhardande, SR. D.R
Hearing: 21.08.2025Pronounced: 29.08.2025

Heard together (4 matters)

I.T.A. No. 2347/Mum/2025
I.T.A. No. 2348/Mum/2025
I.T.A. No. 2349/Mum/2025
I.T.A. No. 2350/Mum/2025

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Per: Smt. Beena Pillai, J.M.: The Present appeals filed by the assessee is against separate orders passed by Ld.CIT(A) 10 Delhi for assessment years 2013-

2 ITA Nos 2350/Mum/2025; A.Y. 2021-22 Suraj Co operative Housing Society Limited 14, 2019-20 to 2021-22 vide impugned orders dated 18/02/2025, 13/02/2025. 2. It is submitted that as the issue alleged in all these appeals are common and identical, ground raised by the assessee for a suspended 2013-14 are reproduced as under:

“1. On the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, th

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →