COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL - III vs. M/S MEGHALAYA CEMENTS LIMITED
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal should be dismissed. This decision was based on the submission made by the Revenue itself, acknowledging the Supreme Court's ruling in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (2016) 383 ITR 0217 (SC). The Supreme Court had held that the assessee is entitled to exemption from tax under Section 80-IB and 80-IC of the Income Tax Act on account of transport subsidy and other subsidies. Consequently, the Tribunal found no necessity to adjudicate the present appeal and ordered its dismissal in view of the binding precedent set by the Apex Court. No issue was expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, Kolkata, against an order concerning the claim of income tax exemption for transport subsidy received by the assessee. The departmental authorities had previously held that the assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 80-IB and 80-IC of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was filed under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act. The Supreme Court had recently delivered a judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (2016) 383 ITR 0217 (SC), which dealt with similar claims of exemption for transport subsidy.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the assessee is entitled to exemption from tax under Section 80-IB and 80-IC of the Income Tax Act on account of transport subsidy received. (Question of law) Assessee's contentions: Not recorded as the assessee was not represented. Revenue's contentions: The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant (Revenue) fairly admitted that the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (2016) 383 ITR 0217 (SC) has held that an assessee is entitled to exemption under Section 80-IB and 80-IC of the Income Tax Act on account of transport subsidy and other subsidies. Therefore, the Revenue contended that adjudication of this appeal is unnecessary and it should be dismissed in light of the Supreme Court's judgment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA 221/2017 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AJIT SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN (Ajit Singh, CJ) Mr. Sonjay Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department for th e appellant. None for the respondent. Heard on admission. This Appeal relates to the claim of income tax exemption for the transpo rt subsidy amount received by the assessee. The departmental authorities declare d that the assessee is entitled to exemption to tax under Section 80-IB and 80-I C of the Income Tax Act and that is how, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central )-III, Kolkata has filed this Appeal, under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act . During the course of hearing, it was fairly admitted on behalf of the ap pellant that the Supreme Court recently in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Meghal aya Steels Ltd. (2016) 383 ITR 0217 (SC), has held that the assessee is entitle d to exemption to tax under Section 80-IB and 80-IC of the Income Tax Act on acc ount of transport subsidy and other subsidies. Therefore adjudication of this Ap peal is contended to be unnecessary and the departmental lawyer fairly submits t hat this Appeal should be dismissed on account of the judgment rendered by the S upreme Court, in the Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (Supra). In view of the above submission made on behalf of the Income Tax Departm ent and having regard to the ratio in Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (Supra), we order di smissal of the Appeal.
More judgments on Section 80-IB
- Zf Steering Gear (India) Limited, Pune vs DCIT Central Circle-15 Delhi, New DelhiITA 4383/DEL/2026[2004-05]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2004-05
- Zf Steering Gear (India) Limited, Pune vs DCIT Central Circle-15, Delhi, New DelhiITA 4382/DEL/2026[2003-04]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2003-04
- Zf Steering Gear (India) Limited, Pune vs DCIT Central Circle-15, New DelhiITA 4381/DEL/2026[2002-03]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2002-03
- Zf Steering Gear (India) Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT Central Circle-15, New DelhiITA 4380/DEL/2026[2001-02]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2001-02
- Zf Steering Gear (India) Limited, India vs DCIT, Central Circle - 15, DelhiITA 4379/DEL/2026[2000-01]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2000-01
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Surveillance System, Sambalpur vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST Odisha , CT And GST Commissionerate , Cuttack OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S.Himansu Palei vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST CBIC Keonjhar Division, KeonjharOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Access Worldwide Cargo vs. The Commissioner Of CustomsKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Greenlam Industries LTD And Another vs. The UOI And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026