COMMISSIONER OF TAX CENTRAL-I vs. M/S. NEZONE INDUSTRIES LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal should be dismissed. This decision was based on the admission by the appellant (Revenue) that the Supreme Court, in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (2016) 383 ITR 0217 (SC), had ruled in favour of the assessee, holding that transport subsidy and other subsidies are eligible for exemption under Sections 80-IB and 80-IC of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the adjudication of the present appeal to be unnecessary in light of this Supreme Court judgment. The ratio decidendi is that if a higher court has already settled a legal issue, subsequent appeals on the same issue by the Revenue, without any distinguishing facts, are likely to be dismissed. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
This appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I, Kolkata, against an order concerning the claim of income tax exemption for transport subsidy received by the assessee. The departmental authorities had previously held that the assessee was entitled to exemption under Sections 80-IB and 80-IC of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. The assessment year(s) are not specified in the judgment. The appellant conceded that the Supreme Court, in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (2016) 383 ITR 0217 (SC), had ruled that transport subsidy and other subsidies are eligible for exemption under Sections 80-IB and 80-IC. Consequently, the appellant argued that the appeal was unnecessary.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the assessee is entitled to exemption from tax on the transport subsidy received under Section 80-IB and Section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee's Contention: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue, through the learned Standing Counsel, admitted that the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (2016) 383 ITR 0217 (SC) has held that the assessee is entitled to exemption from tax under Sections 80-IB and 80-IC of the Income Tax Act on account of transport subsidy and other subsidies. Therefore, the Revenue contended that the adjudication of this appeal was unnecessary and it should be dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA 213/2017 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AJIT SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN (Ajit Singh, CJ) Mr. Sonjay Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department for th e appellant. None for the respondent. Heard on admission. This Appeal relates to the claim of income tax exemption for the transpo rt subsidy amount received by the assessee. The departmental authorities declare d that the assessee is entitled to exemption to tax under Section 80-IB and 80-I C of the Income Tax Act and that is how, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central )-I, Kolkata has filed this Appeal, under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act. During the course of hearing, it was fairly admitted on behalf of the ap pellant that the Supreme Court recently in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Meghal aya Steels Ltd. (2016) 383 ITR 0217 (SC), has held that the assessee is entitle d to exemption to tax under Section 80-IB and 80-IC of the Income Tax Act on acc ount of transport subsidy and other subsidies. Therefore adjudication of this Ap peal is contended to be unnecessary and the departmental lawyer fairly submits t hat this Appeal should be dismissed on account of the judgment rendered by the S upreme Court, in the Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (Supra). In view of the above submission made on behalf of the Income Tax Departm ent and having regard to the ratio in Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (Supra), we order di smissal of the Appeal.
More judgments on Section 80-IB
- Zf Steering Gear (India) Limited, Pune vs DCIT Central Circle-15 Delhi, New DelhiITA 4383/DEL/2026[2004-05]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2004-05
- Zf Steering Gear (India) Limited, Pune vs DCIT Central Circle-15, Delhi, New DelhiITA 4382/DEL/2026[2003-04]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2003-04
- Zf Steering Gear (India) Limited, Pune vs DCIT Central Circle-15, New DelhiITA 4381/DEL/2026[2002-03]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2002-03
- Zf Steering Gear (India) Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT Central Circle-15, New DelhiITA 4380/DEL/2026[2001-02]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2001-02
- Zf Steering Gear (India) Limited, India vs DCIT, Central Circle - 15, DelhiITA 4379/DEL/2026[2000-01]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2000-01
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Ritika Ispat PVT. LTD.,Balanda, Sundergarh vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S Shree Sai Jagannath, Rourkela, Sundargarh vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S.Shree Construction, Khordha vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Pramod Kumar Behera vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Santosh Kumar Pradhan (Late Biswabhar Pradhan) vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026