COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.KALLAKURICHI CO-OPERATIVE

T.C.A.No.966 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.02.2020 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN T.C.A.No.966 of 2019 Commissioner of Income Tax, D.P.Thottam, Muthialpet, Puducherry 605 003. ... Appellant Vs M/s.Kallakurichi Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Unit II, Kachirapalayam, Kallakurichi 606 207, PAN: AAA AK 0655 Q ... Respondent PRAYER: Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench, dated 07.01.2014 passed in ITA.No.1953/Mds/2013. For Appellant :Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Senior standing counsel For Respondent :Mr.A.S.Sriraman 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.966 of 2019 J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J) The matter has been brought before this Court by way of being mentioned. The present Appeal is delinked from T.C.A.No.967 of 2019. Though this Tax Appeal has been dismissed on 04.12.2019, the same is recalled and the following judgment is passed: 2.The Tax Case Appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 07.01.2014 passed in ITA.No.1953/Mds/2013 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench for the assessment year 2008-09. The assessee is a co-operative sugar mill. During the assessment year, the assessee has made a provision for some of the interest on loans payable to the Government of Tamil Nadu. The Assessing officer rejected the claim of Interest paid under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act on the pretext that the loans were obtained from the National Co-operative Development Corporation (NCDC) by co-operative sugar mills. 3.On appeal, the CIT (Appeals) following the decision of the ITAT in assessee's own case in I.T.A.No.1079/Mds/2012 for the assessment year 2006-07 vide order dated 14.12.2012, deleted the disallowance made by the assessing officer. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.966 of 2019 4.Aggrieved against the CIT(A) order, the Revenue filed appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appellate tribunal following its own decision in the assessee's case for the earlier assessment year, dismissed the appeal filed by the department. Aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal, the present appeal has been filed. 5.The appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : “(i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in allowing non-payment of interest u/s.43B to National Co-operative Development Corporation which is a public financial institution? (ii)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in allowing deduction u/s.80P when the assessee gross total income after set off carry forward loss in Nil? (iii)Whether the finding of the Tribunal is proper especially when the method of accounting followed by the assessee is mercantile and interest payment is to be allowed u/s.43 B?" 6.Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that there was an 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.966 of 2019 audit objection raised and accepted for the other Assessment year on the same issue which is raised in the present appeal. Therefore this case falls under the exception mentioned in para 10(c) of the Circular No.3/2018 [F.No.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ (PT)], Dated 11.07.2018 and the case cannot be disposed on the ground of low tax effect. 7.The said submission is rejected as the present assessment is not the subject matter of audit objection and tax effect in this case is less than Rs.1 crore and is covered by Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Director, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Delhi. As per the said circular, the monetary limit to file an appeal before the High Court is fixed at Rs.1 crore. In this case, tax effect is less than Rs.1 crore and therefore, the appeal has to be dismissed. 8.This Court has also perused the circular dated 08.08.2019 and Paragraph No.2 of the Circular, which prescribes monetary limit for filing appeal. Paragraph No.2 is usefully extracted as follows: "2.As a step towards further management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board that monetary limits for filing of appeals in income-tax cases be enhanced further through amendment in Para 3 of the Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the table for 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.966 of 2019 monetary limits specified in Para 3 of the Circular shall read as follows: S.No. Appeals / SLPs in Income- tax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1. Before Appeallate Tribunal 50,00,000 2. Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3. Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000" 9.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent and also in view of the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Director, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Delhi, the Tax Case Appeal is dismissed on account of tax effect. However, the substantial question of laws framed are left open. In the event the tax effect is above the limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (NKKJ) (TKRJ) 14.02.2020 sai 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.966 of 2019 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J. sai To 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax, D.P.Thottam, Muthialpet, Puducherry 605 003. 2.Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai. T.C.A.Nos.966 of 2019 Dated : 14.02.2020 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/