COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.L.S.MILLS LTD.,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeal on the grounds of low tax effect, citing Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019. The circular specifies a monetary limit of Rs. 1 crore for filing appeals before the High Court. As the tax effect in this case was less than Rs. 1 crore, the appeal was dismissed. However, the Court explicitly stated that the substantial questions of law framed were left open. Liberty was granted to the Revenue to mention the case for restoration if the tax effect is found to be above the limit prescribed in the circular, allowing the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs were awarded.
What were the facts?
The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle I, Madurai) filed a Tax Case Appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Madras against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chennai 'D' Bench, dated 15.03.2018, for the assessment year 2015-16. The appeal challenged the ITAT's decision which had dismissed the Revenue's appeal against an order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The CIT(A) had directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit for the assessee (M/s. L.S. Mills Limited) by including surcharge and education cess. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s direction, leading to the present appeal by the Revenue.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in holding that surcharge and education cess should form part of the tax while computing the MAT credit given to the assessee under Section 115JAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961? (Question of law) 2. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in holding that Explanation 2 of Section 115JB, which defines the meaning of tax for calculating book profits liable to tax, can be extended to Section 115JAA? (Question of mixed law and fact) Assessee's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's contentions: The tax effect in this case is less than Rs. 1 crore. Therefore, the appeal is covered by Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the CBDT, which sets the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court at Rs. 1 crore. Consequently, the appeal should be dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
T.C.A.No.699 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.01.2020 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN T.C.A.No.699 of 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax Circle I, Madurai ... Appellant Vs M/s.L.S.Mills Limited, Post Box No.12, Madurai Road, Theni PAN: AAACL 3081 D ... Respondent PRAYER : Appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench, dated 15.03.2018 in ITA.No.1918/MDS/2018. For Appellant :Mr.M.Swaminathan Senior standing counsel For Respondent : Mr.J.Balachander J U D G M E N T 1/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.699 of 2018 (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J) This Tax Case Appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 15.03.2018 in ITA.No.1918/CHNY/2018 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench for the assessment year 2015-16. 2.Aggrieved against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (appeals) directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the MAT credit given to the assessee, after taking into account surcharge at the rate of 10% and educational cess at the rate of 3%, the Revenue has filed ITA.No.1918/MDS/2018, before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal has rejected the plea of the Tribunal and dismissed the same. Against the dismissal order, the present appeal has been preferred by the Revenue. 3.Heard the parties. 4.The appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : “1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in 2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.699 of 2018 holding that the surcharge and education cess should form part of the tax while computing the MAT credit given to the assessee u/s.115JAA? (ii)Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in holding that the explanation 2 of Section 115JB to define the meaning of tax for calculating book profits liable to tax u/s.115JB can be extended to Section 115JAA?" 5.Mr.M.Swaminathan, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that the tax effect in this case is less than Rs.1 crore and is covered by Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Director, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Delhi. As per the said circular, the monetary limit to file an appeal before the High Court is fixed at Rs.1 crore. In this case, tax effect is less than Rs.1 crore and therefore, the case has to be dismissed. 6.This Court perused the circular dated 08.08.2019 and Paragraph No.2 of the said Circular, which prescribes monetary limit for filing appeal is usefully extracted as follows: 3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.699 of 2018 2.As a step towards further management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board that monetary limits for filing of appeals in income-tax cases be enhanced further through amendment in Para 3 of the Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the table for monetary limits specified in Para 3 of the Circular shall read as follows: S.No. Appeals / SLPs in Income- tax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1. Before Appeallate Tribunal 50,00,000 2. Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3. Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 7.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and also in view of the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Director, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Delhi, the Tax Case Appeal is dismissed on account of tax effect. However, the substantial questions of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect is above the limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs. (NKKJ) (PVJ) 10.01.2020 4/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.699 of 2018 sai To 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax Circle I, Madurai 2.Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai. 5/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.699 of 2018 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and P.VELMURUGAN
, J.
sai T.C.A.No.699 of 2018 Dated : 10.01.2020 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in
More judgments on Section 115JAA
- Lupin Investments Private Limited, Mumbai vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 5860/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Myra Mall Management Company Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3360/MUM/2026[AY 2012-13]Status: Disposed27 Aug 2026
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Baramati Agro Limited, PuneITA 395/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed25 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
- Manu Vyapar Private Limited, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 4(1), KolkataITA 792/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2026AY 2021-2022
- Sanjana Cryogenic Storages Ltd, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 757/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Jul 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026