MANU VYAPAR PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 4(1), KOLKATA
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Non-Banking Finance Company, filed its return of income for AY 2021-22 on 18.02.2022. The CPC processed the return and charged interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The assessee's rectification applications were dismissed, and the CIT(A) also dismissed its appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee filed its return within the extended due date due to COVID-19. Therefore, levying interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was erroneous. The Tribunal directed the CPC to consider the MAT credit for calculating interest liability.
What were the issues?
Whether interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was correctly levied when the return was filed within the extended due date due to COVID-19? Whether MAT credit should be considered for calculating interest liability?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 115JAA,Section 139(1),Section 143(1),Section 154,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH,
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short) dated 05.01.2026, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2021-22. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, Assessee is a Non-Banking Finance Company filed its return of income for the assessment year 2021-22 passed u/s 139(1) of the Act on 18.02.2022 declaring total income of Rs.2,03,82,390/-. The return of the Assessee has been processed by CPC, Bengaluru and raised a demand amounting to Manu Vyapar Private Limited; A.Y: 2021-22 Rs.1,31,430/- vide passing Intima
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 234A
- Late Hetalkumar Gunvantlal Soni (Through… vs ITO Ward 1(2)(3), AhmedabadITA 462/AHD/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Pramod Dwivedi, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-1(2), RaipurITA 597/RPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026