COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.TAMILNADU INDUSTRIAL
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that no substantial question of law arose for its consideration under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court noted that a Coordinate Bench had previously held that Form No. 10 filed belatedly could be taken into account by the Assessing Officer and had remanded the case back to the Assessing Authority in the case of "Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain -vs- Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, (Exemptions), Chennai" reported in [2019] 110 taxmann.com 11 (Madras). Therefore, the High Court was of the opinion that the Assessing Authority had rightly taken into account the Form No. 10 filed by the assessee, albeit belatedly, and had granted the desired relief. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue were considered infructuous and were disposed of without answering the question of law. The operative direction was that the appeals were disposed of as infructuous.
What were the facts?
The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) filed two appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Madras against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Madras 'C' Bench, dated 27.11.2015. The appeals pertained to Assessment Year 2007-08. The ITAT had set aside the assessments for both years and restored the matters to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh assessments, directing the AO to consider Form No. 10 filed by the assessee, Tamilnadu Industrial Guidance & Export Promotion Bureau, along with the returns filed in response to a notice under Section 148. The ITAT also remitted the issue of corpus donation addition back to the AO. The assessee contended that the appeals had become infructuous as the AO had already granted relief based on the belatedly filed Form No. 10 in an order dated 28.09.2016.
What were the issues?
1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that Form 10 can be accepted by the assessing officer during reassessment proceedings, in contravention to the decision reported in 198 ITR 297(SC), when Form 10 was not submitted along with the return and also even before the completion of original assessment, thereby remitting the case for fresh assessment? Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that the appeals filed by the Revenue had become infructuous because the Assessing Officer had already granted the relief to the assessee based on the belatedly filed Form No. 10, vide his order dated 28.09.2016 for the Assessment Year 2007-08, pursuant to the impugned remand order of the Tribunal. The assessee relied on the decision of a Coordinate Bench of the High Court in "Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain -vs- Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, (Exemptions), Chennai" reported in [2019] 110 taxmann.com 11 (Madras). Revenue's Contention: The Revenue's contention is implicit in the substantial question of law raised, which challenges the Tribunal's decision to allow the belated filing of Form 10 during reassessment proceedings, citing a Supreme Court decision.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Judgment dated 13.08.2020 in TCA Nos.386 & 387 of 2017 CITv . Tamilnadu Industrial Guidance & Export Promotion Bureau IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.08.2020 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY T.C.A.Nos.386 & 387 of 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai. ... Appellant -Vs- M/s.Tamilnadu Industrial Guidance & Export Promotion Bureau, 19A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. PAN: AACCT7538B ... Respondent Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench dated 27.11.2015 in I.T.A.Nos.2475 & 2476/Mds/2014. For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr.Vineet Kothari,J) The Court was held by Video Conference as per the Resolution of the Full Court dated 03 July 2020, by Judges at the respective residence and the counsel, staff of the Court appearing from their respective residences. Page 1 / 6 http://www.judis.nic.in Judgment dated 13.08.2020 in TCA Nos.386 & 387 of 2017 CITv . Tamilnadu Industrial Guidance & Export Promotion Bureau 2. These appeals have been filed by the Revenue arising from the order dated 27.11.2015 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench for the Assessment Year 2007-08. The substantial question of law raised in these appeals is as under. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the tribunal was right in holding that that the form 10 can be accepted by the assessing officer during the reassessment proceedings in contravention to the decision reported in 198 ITR 297(SC) when form 10 was not submitted along with the return and also even before the completion of original ( assessment and thereby remitting the case for fresh assessment?” 3. The Tribunal, in its order dated 27.11.2015 has held as under. “ 8.In view of the above decision of the Delhi High Court which is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case, the assessee can file Form NO.10 in the course of reassessment proceedings. Since the lower authorities have not considered Form NO.10 which was filed along with the return of income in response to notice under section 148 and completed the assessment denying exemption under section 11, we set aside the assessments for both the assessment years and restore the matters to the file of the Assessing Officer with a direction to make fresh assessments taking into consideration the Form NO.10 Page 2 / 6 http://www.judis.nic.in Judgment dated 13.08.2020 in TCA Nos.386 & 387 of 2017 CITv . Tamilnadu Industrial Guidance & Export Promotion Bureau filed by the assessee along with the returns of income filed in response to the notice under section 148 of the Act, after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 9. The assessee raised one more ground in respect of addition made by the Assessing Officer with regard to corpus donation treating as income of the assessee. Since we have set aside the assessments for fresh consideration in view of the Form NO.10 filed by the assessee, we feel it appropriate to remit this issue also back to the file of the Assessing Officer who shall consider this issue afresh in accordance with law. 10. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.” 4. The Tribunal in its impugned order has only remanded the case back to the Assessing Authority to take into consideration Form No.10 filed by the Assessee belatedly about the accumulation of income by the respondent Assessee, which is a Registered Society entitled to exemption under Section 11 of the Act subject to certain conditions. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent Assessee Mr.R.Sivaraman apprised the Court while relying upon the decision of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of “Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain -vs- Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, (Exemptions), Chennai”
reported in [2019] 110 Page 3 / 6 http://www.judis.nic.in Judgment dated 13.08.2020 in TCA Nos.386 & 387 of 2017 CITv . Tamilnadu Industrial Guidance & Export Promotion Bureau taxmann.com 11 (Madras) and submitted that in pursuance of the impugned remand order of the learned Tribunal dated 27.11.2015, the Assessing Authority has already granted the relief to the Assessee on the basis of the said Form No.10 filed belatedly by the Assessee vide his order dated 28.09.2016 for the Assessment Year 2007-08. He therefore submitted that the present appeals have rendered infructuous. 6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that even otherwise we are satisfied that against the impugned order of the learned Tribunal, no question of law arises for our consideration under Section 260A of the Act, since a Coordinate Bench has already held that Form No.10 filed belatedly could be taken into account by the Assessing Officer and has remanded the case back to the Assessing Authority in the case of “Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain -vs- Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, (Exemptions), Chennai” reported in [2019] 110 taxmann.com 11 (Madras) . Therefore, we are of the opinion that the learned Assessing Authority has rightly taken into account the Form No.10 filed by the Assessee in the present case albeit belatedly and has granted the desired relief to the respondent Assessee, which is a Government Company incorporated for promotion of Industrial Development in the State. Page 4 / 6 http://www.judis.nic.in Judgment dated 13.08.2020 in TCA Nos.386 & 387 of 2017 CITv . Tamilnadu Industrial Guidance & Export Promotion Bureau 7. In view of this, we do not find any merit in the present appeals filed by the Revenue, which in our opinion, have rendered infructuous. The appeals are disposed of as such, without requiring us to answer the question of law in the matter. No costs. (V.K.,J.) (K.R.,J.) 13.08.2020 KST To Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench Page 5 / 6 http://www.judis.nic.in Judgment dated 13.08.2020 in TCA Nos.386 & 387 of 2017 CITv . Tamilnadu Industrial Guidance & Export Promotion Bureau Dr.VINEET KOTHARI, J. and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. KST T.C.A.Nos.386 & 387 of 2017 13.08.2020 Page 6 / 6 http://www.judis.nic.in
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026