The Principal Commissioner o vs. ESPN Digital Media (India) P
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the learned counsel for the appellant (Revenue) submitted that he was not pressing the tax case appeal and had made an endorsement to that effect. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the tax case appeal as not pressed. No costs were awarded. The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the case or the underlying issues that might have been before the Tribunal. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore (the Revenue) against an order dated 04.05.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras "A" Bench, Chennai. The assessee is M/s. ESPN Digital Media (India) Pvt. Ltd. The appeal is filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The specific assessment year(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the Tribunal's order is not detailed.
What were the issues?
The Tribunal was not required to decide any substantive issues as the appeal was not pressed. The primary question before the High Court was whether the Tax Case Appeal filed by the Revenue should be entertained. The Revenue's contention, as presented by its learned counsel, was that it was not pressing the appeal. The judgment does not record any specific arguments or contentions from the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
T.C.A. No. 316 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.11.2022 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN T.C.A. No. 316 of 2022 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore. ..Appellant Vs. M/s. ESPN Digital Media (India) Pvt. Ltd., Unit No. A2, A Wing, 3rd Floor, Divyasree Chambers, 'O' Shaughnessy Road, Langford Town, Bengaluru – 560 025. PAN: AABCC2534R. ..Respondent Prayer: Tax Case Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as against the order dated 04.05.2022 in I.T.A. No. 1070/Chny/2018 of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras "A" Bench, Chennai. S. VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND C. SARAVANAN,J. nv https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A. No. 316 of 2022 For Appellant :: Mr.T. Ravikumar J U D G M E N T S. VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND C. SARAVANAN,J. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is not pressing the tax case appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. Accordingly, the tax case appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. (S.V.N.J.) (C.S.N.J.) nv 14.11.2022 T.C.A. No. 316 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026