COCHIN NAVAL BASE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.4146 vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the petitioner's appeal against the assessment order was pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Court observed that in matters involving Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, it has been consistently directing the Appellate Authority to consider and pass orders on the appeal itself, rather than merely on the stay petition. Therefore, the Court deemed it fit to dispose of the writ petition by directing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal expeditiously. The Court also directed that no coercive steps shall be initiated against the petitioner pursuant to the assessment order until the disposal of the appeal. The issue of whether the petitioner satisfied the ingredients of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society and whether the assessing officer correctly applied the Supreme Court judgment were not decided on merits by the High Court, but were left to be decided by the Appellate Authority.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Cochin Naval Base Civilian Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. No. 4146, is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) issued an assessment order on April 6, 2021, rejecting the petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The ITO's reasoning was that the petitioner did not satisfy the ingredients of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society as defined under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and also a stay petition. Despite an earlier court order restraining recovery until the stay petition was disposed of, the stay petition remained unconsidered. The petitioner argued that the assessing officer failed to consider the Supreme Court judgment in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, which was delivered prior to the assessment order.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the assessing officer erred in rejecting the deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act by not considering the ingredients of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act? 2. Whether the assessing officer failed to consider the Supreme Court judgment in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax when passing the assessment order? Assessee's Contentions: The petitioner argued that the assessing officer failed to consider the Supreme Court judgment in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, despite the assessment order being passed subsequent to this judgment. The petitioner also sought to canvass that the ingredients of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society were satisfied. Revenue's Contentions: No specific contentions for the revenue were recorded in the judgment regarding the merits of the case. The revenue was represented by counsel, but their arguments on the issues were not detailed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Even though by order dated 26.08.2021, this Court had restrained the respondents from proceeding with the recovery of the amount involved in the order of assessment, till disposal of the stay petition filed by the petitioner before the statutory authority, it is informed across the Bar that till date, the stay petition has not been considered.
Having regard to the fact that in matters where issue of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act is applicable, this Court has been consistently directing the Appellate Authority to consider and pass appropriate orders on the appeal itself, rather than directing consideration of the stay petition. The circumstances reveal that, similar orders can be passed in this case also.
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. Ext.P3 order of assessment was issued against the petitioner on 06.04.2021. In the assessment order, petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P was rejected on the ground that there was no evidence to show that petitioner satisfied the ingredients of the Primary Agricultural Credit Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.
WP(C) NO. 16867 OF 2021 3
While assailing the assessment order before the first respondent, petitioner has sought to canvass that the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax [2021 (1) KLT 485] was not considered by the assessing officer though the assessment order was rendered subsequent to the Supreme Court Judgment. 5 Since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal as Ext.P5 and the same is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent, I deem it fit that this writ petition be disposed of directing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal in a time bound manner.
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5, as expeditiously as possible.
Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be initiated against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P3 assessment order. The writ petition is disposed of as above. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM
WP(C) NO. 16867 OF 2021 4
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shivaraj M S vs. The Union Of INDIAKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026