COCHIN NAVAL BASE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.4146 vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2

PDF · subscribers
WP(C)/16867/2021HC KeralaKLHC01044349202102 December 2021Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court noted that the petitioner's appeal against the assessment order was pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Court observed that in matters involving Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, it has been consistently directing the Appellate Authority to consider and pass orders on the appeal itself, rather than merely on the stay petition. Therefore, the Court deemed it fit to dispose of the writ petition by directing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal expeditiously. The Court also directed that no coercive steps shall be initiated against the petitioner pursuant to the assessment order until the disposal of the appeal. The issue of whether the petitioner satisfied the ingredients of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society and whether the assessing officer correctly applied the Supreme Court judgment were not decided on merits by the High Court, but were left to be decided by the Appellate Authority.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Cochin Naval Base Civilian Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. No. 4146, is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) issued an assessment order on April 6, 2021, rejecting the petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The ITO's reasoning was that the petitioner did not satisfy the ingredients of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society as defined under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and also a stay petition. Despite an earlier court order restraining recovery until the stay petition was disposed of, the stay petition remained unconsidered. The petitioner argued that the assessing officer failed to consider the Supreme Court judgment in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, which was delivered prior to the assessment order.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the assessing officer erred in rejecting the deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act by not considering the ingredients of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act? 2. Whether the assessing officer failed to consider the Supreme Court judgment in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax when passing the assessment order? Assessee's Contentions: The petitioner argued that the assessing officer failed to consider the Supreme Court judgment in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, despite the assessment order being passed subsequent to this judgment. The petitioner also sought to canvass that the ingredients of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society were satisfied. Revenue's Contentions: No specific contentions for the revenue were recorded in the judgment regarding the merits of the case. The revenue was represented by counsel, but their arguments on the issues were not detailed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 16867 OF 2021 PETITIONER : COCHIN NAVAL BASE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.4146, NAVAL BASE, COCHIN - 682 004 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS. M.SASINDRAN SREEHARI INDUKALADHARAN RESPONDENTS : 1 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KACHERIPPADY, ERNAKULAM - 682 018. 2 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), KOCHI - 682 002. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC BY ADV.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 16867 OF 2021 2 BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P.(C) No.16867 of 2021 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2021

JUDGMENT Even though by order dated 26.08.2021, this Court had restrained the respondents from proceeding with the recovery of the amount involved in the order of assessment, till disposal of the stay petition filed by the petitioner before the statutory authority, it is informed across the Bar that till date, the stay petition has not been considered.

2.

Having regard to the fact that in matters where issue of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act is applicable, this Court has been consistently directing the Appellate Authority to consider and pass appropriate orders on the appeal itself, rather than directing consideration of the stay petition. The circumstances reveal that, similar orders can be passed in this case also.

3.

Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. Ext.P3 order of assessment was issued against the petitioner on 06.04.2021. In the assessment order, petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P was rejected on the ground that there was no evidence to show that petitioner satisfied the ingredients of the Primary Agricultural Credit Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.

WP(C) NO. 16867 OF 2021 3

4.

While assailing the assessment order before the first respondent, petitioner has sought to canvass that the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax [2021 (1) KLT 485] was not considered by the assessing officer though the assessment order was rendered subsequent to the Supreme Court Judgment. 5 Since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal as Ext.P5 and the same is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent, I deem it fit that this writ petition be disposed of directing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal in a time bound manner.

6.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5, as expeditiously as possible.

7.

Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be initiated against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P3 assessment order. The writ petition is disposed of as above. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM

WP(C) NO. 16867 OF 2021 4

Appendix — schedule of exhibits
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16867/2021 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : Exhibit P1 TRUE TYPED COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.4146 DATED 29/07/1957 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.LC.R.B./1376/18/K.DIS. DATED 31/03/2018 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), ERNAKULAM. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 06/04/2021 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2018- 2019 ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 06/04/2021 ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28/06/2021 IN W.A.NO.753/2021.

More judgments on Section 80P

All 5,069 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →