KRISHAN KEDIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the notice dated 27.07.2022 under Section 148 and the assessment order dated 21.03.2023. The Court relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in Union of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal. The Court analyzed the time limits for issuing reassessment notices under the old and new provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the impact of the Time Limit Extension Order (TOLA). For the Assessment Year 2014-2015, the time limit for issuing a notice under Section 148, if it were to be issued within three years, would expire on 31.03.2018. If it were to be issued within six years, it would expire on 31.03.2021. However, considering the period of limitation surviving under TOLA, the time limit was extended to 30.06.2021. The notice in the present case was issued on 27.07.2022, which was beyond the extended period. Therefore, the notice and the consequent assessment order were held to be barred by limitation.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Krishan Kedia, challenged a notice dated 27.07.2022 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the subsequent assessment order dated 21.03.2023 for Assessment Year 2014-2015. The petitioner argued that the notice was issued after the substitution of Section 148 by the Finance Act, 2021, and was therefore barred by limitation. The original notice under Section 148 was issued on 06.04.2021, which was later cancelled, and a fresh notice under Section 148A(d) was issued on 27.07.2022. The petitioner's appeal against the assessment order before the CIT(A) was dismissed on the ground that the reopening under the old Section 148 was barred by limitation. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the notice dated 27.07.2022, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2014-2015, is barred by limitation, considering the substitution of Section 148 by the Finance Act, 2021, and the applicability of the Time Limit Extension Order (TOLA). Assessee's contentions: - The notice dated 27.07.2022 under Section 148 is barred by limitation due to the coming into force of the Finance Act, 2021, which substituted Section 148. The assessment order under Section 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B is therefore bad in law. - The controversy is settled by the Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal [2024] 469 ITR 46 (SC), and the petitioner's case is covered by this judgment. Revenue's contentions: - The judgment records no specific contentions for the revenue other than their role as respondents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148,Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 148A,Section 149,Section 151,Section 3(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
shall thereafter pass an order fter following the due procedure 8A(b) in respect of each of may be available to the asses which may be available under f the and ders the nder Act, tion irty and can rior be ices ded een r in e as the ssee the TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
lea Sen resp ord Rev bel suc exc the this aga Cou We pow 24(O&M) Finance Act, 2021 and in law to the Assessing Officer und open and/or shall continue to (v) The present order s judgments and orders pass quashing the similar notices 148 of the IT Act irrespe assailed before this Court or There is a broad consensus on rned ASG appearing on behalf nior Advocates/learned counse pective assessees. We are also der is passed, it will strike a b venue as well as the respective lief of the officers of the Revenu ch notices, the Revenue may not chequer which would suffer. The e present order with a view avoid s Court and burden this Court ainst the similar judgments and urts, the particulars of some of e have also proposed to pass the wers under Article 142 of the Co -26- w and whatever rights are availa der the Finance Act, 2021 are k o be available and; shall substitute/modify respec ed by the respective High Cou s issued under unamended sect ective of whether they have b r not. the aforesaid aspects amongst lf of the Revenue and the learn el appearing on behalf of of the opinion that if the afores balance between the rights of assesses as because of a bonaf ue in issuing approximately 900 t suffer as ultimately it is the pub erefore, we have proposed to p ding filing of further appeals bef with approximately 9000 appe orders passed by the various H which are referred to hereinabo e aforesaid order in exercise of Constitution of India by holding t
able kept tive urts tion een the ned the said the fide 000 blic pass fore eals High ove. our that TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
the ord also ord the
App and W.T her 24(O&M) e present order shall govern, not ders passed by the High Court of o be made applicable in resp ders passed by various High erefore the present order shall be In view of the above and for th peals are ALLOWED IN PART. d orders passed by the High Co T. No. 524/2021 and other a reby modified and substituted as (i) The impugned section 14 assessees which were issued the IT Act, which were the before the various respectiv have been issued under s substituted by the Finance A to be show cause notices assessing officer shall, withi the respective assessees info by the Revenue, so that the cause notices within two wee (ii) The requirement of con with the prior approval of -27- t only the impugned judgments a f Judicature at Allahabad, but sh pect of the similar judgments a Courts across the country a e applicable to PAN INDIA. e reasons stated above, the pres The impugned common judgme ourt of Judicature at Allahabad allied tax appeals/petitions, is/ under: - 48 notices issued to the respec d under unamended section 148 e subject matter of writ petiti ve High Courts shall be deemed section 148A of the IT Act Act, 2021 and construed or trea in terms of section 148A(b). T in thirty days from today provide formation and material relied up e assesees can reply to the sho eks thereafter; nducting any enquiry, if requir f specified authority under sect
and hall and and sent ents d in /are tive 8 of ions d to as ated The e to pon ow- red, tion TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
jud and issu gov afo 24(O&M) 148A(a) is hereby dispensed avis those notices which hav the unamended Act from 01 which have been quashed by as observed hereinabove ho approval of specified authori concerned Assessing Officers (iii) The assessing officers sh of section 148A(d) in res assessees; Thereafter after fo under section 148A may is substituted); (iv) All defences which m including those available un all rights and contentions concerned assessees and Rev and in law shall continue to b The present order shall be dgments and orders passed by d d under which similar notices w ued under section 148 of the verned by the present order oresaid extent. The present orde -28- d with as a one-time measure v ve been issued under section 148 1.04.2021 till date, including th y the High Courts. Even otherw olding any enquiry with the pr ity is not mandatory but it is for s to hold any enquiry, if required hall thereafter pass orders in ter spect of each of the concern following the procedure as requi ssue notice under section 148 may be available to the asses nder section 149 of the IT Act a which may be available to venue under the Finance Act, 20 be available. applicable PAN INDIA and different High Courts on the is which were issued after 01.04.20 Act are set aside and shall and shall stand modified to er is passed in exercise of pow
vis- 8 of hose wise rior the d; rms ned ired (as sses and the 021 all ssue 021 be the wers TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
und fur sim wit sha Hig issu
Cou var ord men afo
The in case of Unio SC 543l, Hon’b 148 issued to th 148 of the Inco various respecti 148-A of the In construed or tre further held tha passing of the 24(O&M) -29- ution of India so as to avoid a on the very issue by challeng th a view not to burden this Co We also observe that present or t petitions, pending before vari tices under Section 148 of the challenge. ents and orders passed by the H ar judgments and orders passed ularly, the respective judgments a gh Courts particulars of which tand modified/substituted to dgment of Hon’ble Supreme Co hish Aggarwal [2022] SCC Onl the impugned notices under Sect ere issued under unamended Sect matter of writ petitions before d to have been issued under Sect by the Finance Act, 2021 and n terms of Section 148A(b). It w within 30 days from the date ovide to the respective assess
any ging ourt rder ous Act High d by and are the ourt line tion tion the tion d be was e of sees TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
information and reply to the sho the Hon’ble Su notices would “t be issued and th point.” The in under Section 1 considering the 148A(d) and su issued to the as 2022, for the As 24(O&M) d material relied upon by the R ow cause notices within 2 week upreme Court that the requirem the prior approval of specified a as one time measure viz-a-viz 48 of the unamended Act from 0 2022 (Decision in Ashish Agga ereafter pass orders in terms of d assessees and thereafter, after f 48A may issue notice(s) under S n 11.05.2022 following the decis garwal, the Central Board of Dire of the decision in Ashish Aggar e judgment in Ashish Aggarwal essment notices were issued, irr allenged or not. These instructio travel back in time to their origi hen new Section 149 of the Inco nstructions further elaborated th 148 of the new regime. The A replies furnished by the asses ubsequently notices under Sect ssessees by the Assessing Offic ssessment Year 2013-2014, 2014 -30- Revenue, so that the Assessees ks thereafter. It was further held ment of conducting any enquiry authority under Section 148A(a z those notices which were issu 01.04.2021 (Finance Act, 2021) arwal). Further that the Assess Section 148A(d) in respect of e following the procedure as requi Section 148 (as substituted). sion in Union of India and Oth ect Taxes issued instructions for rwal’s case (supra), wherein it w would apply to all the cases wh respective of the fact whether su ons further stated that reassessm inal date when such notices were ome Tax Act is to be applied at t he mechanism for issuing noti Assessing Officers accordingly a ssees passed orders under Sect tion 148 of the new regime w cers, between July and Septem 4-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017
can d by y, if a) is ued till sing ach ired hers the was here uch ment e to that ices after tion were mber and TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
2017-2018. Th declared the not appropriate sanc
In deal with the iss time limits pres relaxations prov Provisions) Act Section 148 of between July an 2015, 2015-201 being issued wi challenged by w Union of India the following iss B.
Bef relevant portion 24(O&M) hese notices were challenged tices to be invalid being time b ction of the specified authority. Ashish Aggarwal’s case (supr sue as to whether or not reassessm scribed under the provisions of vided under the Taxation and O t, 2020 (TOLA). Different High the new regime issued to the a nd September 2022, for the A 6, 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 to valid.” fore proceeding further it woul n of the judgment passed by the H -31- before several High Courts, w arred and being issued without ra) Hon’ble Supreme Court did ment notices were issued within f Income Tax Act, 1961 read w Other Laws (Relaxation of Cert h Courts declared the notices un assessees by the Assessing Offic Assessment Year 2013-2014, 20 o be invalid, being time barred specified authority. The same w ore the Hon’ble Supreme Court The Hon’ble Supreme Court fram ers Vs. Rajiv Bansal :- s gives rise to the following issue otification issued under it will a es issued after 1 April 2021; and ment notices issued under Sect ween July and September 2022 ld be appropriate to reproduce Hon’ble Supreme Court in the c
who the not the with tain nder cers 014- and were t in med es:- also tion are the case TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
of Union of I reproduced as un “ii. 6. com con the to sta the (Re tim spe 202 Cen TO com 7. into 2(1 Act com com 24(O&M) India Vs. Rajeev Bansal [2024 nder :- . TOLA On 24 March 2020, the Ce mplete lockdown for the entire ntain the spread of the COVID- e Central Government sought to redress the challenges faced tutory requirements due to the p e President of India promulgat elaxation of Certain Provisions me limits for completion or c ecified Acts falling for completio 20 and 29 June 2020 till 30 J ntral Government issued a notif OLA Ordinance to extend the mpliance of actions under the spe On 29 September 2020, Parlia o force with retrospective effect 1)(b) defines "specified Act" to t. Section 3(1) of TOLA extende mpliance of actions under the mpletion or compliance during th -32- 4] 469 ITR 46 (SC). The same entral Government announced e nation" for twenty-one days -19 pandemic. (14) Following t implement various relief measu by the taxpayers in meeting pandemic. (15) On 31 March 20 ted the Taxation and Other La s) Ordinance 2020 (16) to exte compliance of actions under n or compliance between 20 Ma June 2020. On 24 June 2020, ification under Section 3(1) of e time limit for completion ecified Acts till 31 March 2021. ament enacted TOLA, which ca from 31 March 2020. (18) Sect mean and include the Income T ed the time limit for completion e "specified Act", which fell he period from 20 March 2020 a e is "a s to this, ures the 020, aws end the arch the the or ame tion Tax n or for and TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
31 rea "3( not 20t oth Go com (a) of a oth or spe [...] And ma com in t suc Go
S lim pow exte 24(O&M) December 2020, to 31 March 2 ads thus: (1) Where, any time-limit has b tified under, the specified Act wh th day of March, 2020 to the 31 her date after the 31st day of vernment, may, by notification mpletion or compliance of such a completion of any proceedings any notice, intimation, notificat her action, by whatever name ca tribunal, by whatever name ca ecified Act; ] d where completion of complia de within such time, then, mpliance of such action shall, n the specified Act, stand extended ch other date after 31st day vernment may, by notification, sp Section 3(1) empowered the Cen mit beyond 31 March 2021 by a wers, the Central Government is end the period of relaxation till -33- 2021. The relevant part of Sectio been specified in, or prescribed hich falls during the period from 1st day of December, 2020, or s f December, 2020, as the Cen n, specify in this behalf, for action as – or passing of any order or issua tion, sanction or approval, or su alled, by any authority, commiss alled, under the provisions of ance of such action has not b the timelimit for completion notwithstanding anything contain d to the 31st day of March, 2021 of March, 2021, as the Cen specify in this behalf:" ntral Government to extend the t a notification. In pursuance of ssued the following notifications l 30 June 2021: a. Notification N
on 3 d or the uch tral the nce uch sion the een or ned , or tral ime f its s to No. TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
93 Ma Ma 31 the com Apr exte Jun 9. leg or com com the of s xxx B. 18. 24(O&M) of 2020 dated 31 December 2 arch 2021. Resultantly, TOLA arch 2020 to 30 March 2021; b. March 2021 specified that 31 A e time period covered by TOL mpletion or compliance of action ril 2021; and c. Notification No ended the time limit for complet ne 2021. The effect of TOLA and th gislation was that: (i) if the time p issuance of any notice, sanction mpliance from 20 March 2020 mpletion or compliance of such e stipulated period, then the time such action was extended to 30 J x
xxx
Issues
The present batch of appeals a. Whether TOLA and no apply to reassessment notice b. Whether the reassessm 148 of the new regime betw valid. -34- 2020 extended the end date to covered the period between Notification No. 20 of 2021 da April 2021 shall be the end date LA. It extended the time limit ns under the Income Tax Act till o. 38 of 2021 dated 27 April 20 tion or compliance of actions till e notifications issued under prescribed for passing of any or , or approval fell for completion to 31 March 2021; and (ii) if h action could not be made dur limit for completion or complia June 2021. xxx
xxx s gives rise to the following issue otification issued under it will a es issued after 1 April 2021; and ment notices issued under Sect ween July and September 2022
30 20 ated e of for l 30 021 l 30 the rder n or the ring nce es:- also tion are TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
C. S
Ind 24(O&M) Submissions
Mr N Venkataraman, learne dia, made the following submissio a. Parliament enacted TOLA provide relief and relaxati Revenue during the time of actions and proceedings t complied with within the orig Income Tax Act; b. Section 149 of the new reg to the assesses: (i) the four- year time limit f to three years; (ii) the first proviso to Secti for previous assessment year years; and (iii) the monetary threshold the reassessment for previous c. The relaxations provided "notwithstanding anything Section 3(1), therefore, over notice under Section 148 re Tax Act; -35- ed Additional Solicitor General ons on behalf of the Revenue: A as a free-standing legislation ion to both the assesses and f COVID- 19. TOLA seeks to re that could not be completed ginal time limits specified under gime provides three crucial bene for all situations has been redu ion 149 ensures that re-assessm rs cannot be undertaken beyond of Rupees fifty lakhs will apply s assessment years; under Section 3(1) of TOLA ap contained in the specified A rrides the time limits for issuing ead with section 149 of the Inco
l of n to the elax or the efits ced ment d six y to pply ct." g a ome TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
24(O&M) d. TOLA does not extend th provides a relaxation for actions following the proc regime; e. The Finance Act 2021 s assessment with a new regim does not expressly bar the TOLA applies to the entire I 149 and 151 of the new r Section 149(1)(b) is read wit between 1 April 2021 an assessment years 2013-201 2017, and 2017-2018 will be explained in the tabulation b Assessment Year Within 3 years Exp Lim rea TO 2013-2014 31.03.2017 T app 2014-2015 31.03.2018 T app 2015-2016 31.03.2019 T app 2016-2017 31.03.2020 30. 2017-2018 31.03.2021 30. -36- he life of the old regime. It mer the completion or compliance cedure laid down under the n substituted the old regime for me. The first proviso to Section 1 application of TOLA. Section 3 Income Tax Act, including Secti regime. Once the first proviso th TOLA, then all the notices issu nd 30 June 2021 pertaining 14, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 20 e within the period of limitation below: xpiry of mitation ad with OLA for Within six Years Expiry Limitation read TOLA for (5) O L A not plicable 31.03.2020 30.06.2021 O L A not plicable 31.03.2021 30.06.2021 O L A not plicable 31.03.2022 T O L A applicable .06.2021 31.03.2023 T O L A applicable .06.2021 31.03.2024 T O L A applicable
rely e of new re- 149 3 of ions o to ued to 016- n as of with r (4) 1 1 not not not TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
20 Sau Ma Dh foll 24(O&M) f. The Revenue concedes tha all notices issued on or af dropped as they will not fal prescribed under TOLA; g. Section 2 of TOLA defi include the Income Tax Act. effect on 1 April 2021, is Therefore, TOLA continues t after 1 April 2021; and h. Ashish Agarwal (supra) tr the Revenue between 1 Apri cause notices in terms of Revenue issued notices und between July and August 20 notices issued under the ne were issued beyond the time Tax Act read with TOLA wi exercise undertaken by this C
Mr Percy Pardiwalla, Mr V S urabh Soparkar, and Mr K Shi anish Shah, Mr Darshan Pate aran Gandhi, and Mr Ved J lowing submissions on behalf of -37- at for the assessment year 2015- fter 1 April 2021 will have to ll for completion during the per fines "specified Act" to mean a The new regime, which came i now part of the Income Tax A to apply to the Income Tax Act e reated Section 148 notices issued il 2021 and 30 June 2021 as sho Section 148A(b). Thereafter, der Section 148 of the new reg
Invalidation of the Section 1 ew regime on the ground that t e limit specified under the Inco ill completely frustrate the judic Court in Ashish Agarwal (supra) Sridharan, Mr Tushar Hemani, ivram, learned senior counsel, el, Mr Suhrith Parthasarthy, Jain, learned counsel, made f the respondents:
-16, be riod and into Act. even d by ow- the ime 148 they ome cial . Mr Mr Mr the TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
24(O&M) a. TOLA applies only whe between 20 March 2020 and was enacted after TOLA. C field till the new regime cam Revenue had to issue Sectio regime without recourse to th b. TOLA did not amend the extended the specified time 149(1)(b) only refers to th erstwhile Section 149(1)(b); c. Notification No. 38 of 202 extend the time limits expiri old regime till 30 June 2021. April 2021, when the old reg by a new regime. Therefore into the new regime; d. The notices can be cat categories: i. First category: for assess 2015, the six-year time limit 31 March 2020 and 31 Marc reassessment notices were is be barred by limitation; -38- en the period of limitation expi d 31 March 2021. Finance Act 20 Consequently, TOLA only held e into effect from 1 April 2021. T on 148 notices in terms of the n he extended timelines under TOL e erstwhile Section 149 but mer limits. The first proviso to Sect he period of limitation under 21 was issued on 27 April 2021 ing under Section 149(1)(b) of . The notification was issued afte egime was repealed and substitu e, this notification cannot be re tegorized into the following f sment years 2013-2014 and 20 in terms of Section 149 expired ch 2021 respectively. However, ssued after 1 April 2021 and wo
ires 021 the The new LA; rely tion the 1 to the er 1 uted ead four 014- d on the ould TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
24(O&M) ii. Second category: for th issue pertains to whether authority was obtained by th reassessment notices under S this category of cases, the March 2020. However, not 2020 by obtaining sanction Section 151(1) of the old reg iii. Third category: for asses 2018, the three-year period expired on 31 March 2020 The notices under Section 1 three years, that is, after 1 A were obtained under Section the new regime; and iv. The directions issued b (supra) were not intended challenge the reassessment this Court. Therefore, reasse been initiated for such assess e. The applicability of the fi the new regime has to be test under Section 148 of the new the Income Tax Act, the -39- e assessment year 2015-2016, the sanction of the appropri he assessing officers before issu Section 148 of the old regime. F e four-year period expired on tices were issued after 31 Ma n under Section 151(2) instead gime; ssment years 2016-2017 and 20 d in terms of the amended reg and 31 March 2021, respectiv 148 were issued after the expiry April 2021. However, the sancti n 151(i) instead of Section 151(ii) by this Court in Ashish Agarw to apply to assesses who did notices before the High Courts essment proceedings could not h ses. first proviso to Section 149(1)(b) ted on the date of issuance of no w regime. Even if TOLA is read i e time limits for completion
the iate uing For 31 arch d of 017- ime ely. y of ions i) of wal not s or ave ) of tice into or TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
xxx 44. and E. R i. F 45. 24(O&M) compliance of actions can However, the notices under S issued by the Revenue from J of July to September 2022 stipulated under the Income f. Ashish Agarwal (supra) ca exclude the entire period fro The directions issued by th Constitution cannot contra contained in the Income T Ashish Agarwal (supra) exp available to the assesses un defence of limitation availab g. TOLA is only applicable limits. Section 151 does no issuance of sanctions by th TOLA does not apply to Sect x
xxx
We now proceed to analyse the d judicial background discussed Reading TOLA into the Income First proviso to Section 149(1) of The first proviso to Section 149 -40- be extended till 30 June 20 Section 148 of the new regime w July to September 2022. The per is beyond the extended time lim Tax Act read with TOLA; annot be interpreted in a manner om April 2021 to September 20 is Court under Article 142 of avene the substantive provisi Tax Act. Moreover, this Court pressly left open all the defen nder the new regime, including le under Section 149; and to the provisions that specify t ot prescribe any time limit for he specified authorities. Therefo tion 151. xxx
xxx e issues given the broad legisla above. e Tax Act f the new regime 9(1)(b) provides thus:
were riod mits r to 022. the ions t in nces the ime the fore, tive TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
"14 ass 46. as f 24(O&M)
(1) No notice under section sessment year, - (a) If three years have elap assessment year, unless the c (b) If three years, but not m from the end of the relev Assessing Officer has in po other documents or eviden chargeable to tax, represent escaped assessment amounts lakh rupees or more for that Provided that no notice un any time in a case for the r on or before 1st day of April been issued at that time o beyond the time limit specif (b) of sub-section (1) of this before the commencement of
The ingredients of the proviso follows: (i) no notice under Section 1 at any time for an assessme April 2021; (ii) if it is barr -41- 148 shall be issued for the relev psed from the end of the relev case falls under clause (b); more than ten years, have elap vant assessment year unless ossession of books of account nce which reveal that the inco ted in the form of asset, which ts to or is likely to amount to f year: der section 148 shall be issued relevant assessment year beginn 2021, if such notice could not h on account of being immedia fied under the provisions of cla section, as they stood immediat f the Finance Act, 2021:"
(emphasis supplied) could be broken down for analy 148 of the new regime can be issu ent year beginning on or befor red at the time when the notice
vant vant psed the t or ome has fifty d at ning ave tely ause tely ysis ued re 1 e is TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
Ben any Sub the dat the atta cou inte ass bee is c the only rea prin the 24(O&M) sought to be issued because the provisions of" 149(1)(b) could be issued under Sec assessment year 2021-2022 a issuance of such notice c 149(1)(b) of the old regime. In CTO v. Biswanath Jhunjh ngal Sales Tax Rules 1941 empo y assessment within four year bsequently, the State Governme e law to extend the time limit fro te of assessment. The extension o e respondents on the ground ained finality because of the e uld not be reassessed. This Cou ention of the notification to perm sessment made or order passed, en made before six years. It was clear and the language is unamb e legislative intention by readin ly to the incomplete assessments ached finality because of lapse of nciple that emanates from Biswa e courts should give full effect to -42- of the "time limits specified un ) of the old regime. Thus, a no ction 148 of the new regime and before only if the time limit continued to exist under Sect hunwalla, (1996) 5 SCC 626 owered the Commissioner to rev rs from the date of assessme ent issued a notification follow om four years to six years from of the time limit was challenged that the assessments which h expiry of the period of four ye urt observed that it was the cl mit the Commissioner to revise a d, provided the assessment had held that if the legislative intent biguous, full effect must be given ng the notification as applying ts but also to assessments that h f the earlier prescribed period. T anath Jhunjhunwalla (supra) is t the legislative intention of grant
nder tice for for tion the vise ent. wing the d by had ears lear any not tion n to not had The that ting TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
rea exp 48. dat pro bey wh Afte cam thre issu elap for exp not und exp 49. of w reg bef can ass also 24(O&M) assessment powers to assessing press provision, states otherwise.
Notices have to be judged a te the notice is issued. Section ovided two time limits: (i) four yond four years and within six ye ich escaped assessment amoun er 1 April 2021, the time limits me into force. The ordinary time ee years. Therefore, in all situat ued under the new regime if psed from the end of the releva assessment year 2018-2019, pired on 31 March 2023 under tice is issued after 1 April 2021, der the new regime will be applic pire on 31 March 2022. The first proviso to Section 14 whether the time limit prescribed gime continues to exist for the fore. Resultantly, a notice unde nnot be issued if the period of six sessment year has expired at the o ensures that the new time li -43- officers unless the legislature, . ccording to the law existing on n 149 of the old regime prima r years for all situations and ears if the income chargeable to nted to Rupees one lakh or mo s prescribed under the new reg e limit of four years was reduced tions, reassessment notices could not more than three years h ant assessment year. For examp the four year period would h r the old regime. However, if the three year time limit prescri cable. The three year time limit w 49(1)(b) requires the determinat d under Section 149(1)(b) of the assessment year 2021- 2022 a er Section 148 of the new reg x years from the end of the relev time of issuance of the notice. T mit of ten years prescribed un
by the rily (ii) tax ore. ime d to d be ave ple, ave the bed will tion old and ime vant This nder TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
Sec exa wou exp of t ass am retr the 50. reg lak six cha one ten lak
cou wh 24(O&M) ction 149(1) (b) of the new r ample, for the assessment year uld have expired on 31 March pired on 31 March 2019. Witho the new regime, the Revenue co sessments for the year 2012- ounted to Rupees fifty lakhs rospective operation of Section e assesses. Another important change un gime is the increase in the mon kh to Rupees fifty lakhs. The old years from the end of the relev argeable to tax which escaped e lakh. In comparison, the new years if the escaped assessment khs. This change could be summa Regime Time Limit Old regime Four years but more than six yea New regime Three years but more than ten ye Given Section 149(1)(b) of the uld be issued after three years o ich escaped assessment is mo -44- regime applies prospectively. F r 2012-2013, the ten year per h 2023, while the six year per ut the proviso to Section 149(1) ould have had the power to reop 2013 if the escaped assessm or more. The proviso limits 149(1)(b) to protect the interests nder Section 149(1)(b) of the n netary threshold from Rupees o d regime prescribed a time limi vant assessment year if the inco assessment was more than Rup regime increases the time limi t amounts to more than Rupees f arized thus: Income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment not ars Rupees one lakh or more not ears Rupees fifly lakhs or more e new regime, reassessment noti only if the income chargeable to ore than Rupees fifty lakhs. T
For riod riod )(b) pen ment the s of new one t of ome pees t to fifty ices tax The TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
pro wit old 52. new pas lak Ven not lim be ass 53. disc reg The situ new the the not acc from issu 24(O&M) oviso to Section 149(1)(b) limits th respect to the time limits spec d regime. In Ashish Agarwal (supra), thi w regime must be provided for t st periods. The increase of the m kh to Rupees fifty lakh is nkataraman has also conceded tices issued under the new reg mit prescribed under Section 149( dropped if the income charg sessment is less than Rupees fifty The position of law which ca cussion may be summarized th gime is not prospective. It also ap e time limit of four years is no uations. The Revenue can issue w regime only if three years or e relevant assessment year; (iii) e new regime stipulates that the tices for past assessment year cording to Section 149(1)(b) of m the end of the relevant asse ued invoking the time limit un -45- the retrospectivity of that provis ified under Section 149(1)(b) of is Court held that the benefit of the reassessment conducted for monetary threshold from Rupees o beneficial for the assesses. on behalf of the Revenue that gime by invoking the six year t (1)(b) of the old regime will have geable to tax which has escap y lakhs. an be derived based on the ab hus: (i) Section 149(1) of the n pplies to past assessment years; ow reduced to three years for e notices under Section 148 of less have elapsed from the end the proviso to Section 149(1)(b) e Revenue can issue reassessm rs only if the time limit survi f the old regime, that is, six ye essment year; and (iv) all noti nder Section 149(1)(b) of the sion f the f the the one Mr all ime e to ped ove new (ii) all the d of ) of ment ives ears ices old TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
reg has ii. T 54. exp cla bef pro 149 app not 201 ma (i) f per and (ii) per a. xxx 62. tim com TO 24(O&M) gime will have to be dropped if t s escaped assessment is less than TOLA can extend the time limit The proviso to Section 149(1 pression "beyond the time limit use (b) of subsection (1) of this fore the commencement of the oviso specifically refers to the t 9(1)(b) of the old regime. Th plication of TOLA, the time li tices after 1 April 2021 expires 14-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017 nner: for the assessment years 2013- riod expires on 31 March 2020 d for the assessment years 2016-2 riod expires on 31 March 2020 a Finance Act 2021 substituted th x
xxx
The purpose of Section 3(1) of me limits prescribed under th mpletion or compliance from 20 OLA was enacted in the backd -46- the income chargeable to tax wh n Rupees fifty lakhs. t till 31 June 2021 1)(b) of the new regime uses t specified under the provisions section, as they stood immedia e Finance Act, 2021." Thus, time limits specified under Sect he Revenue accepts that with imit for issuance of reassessm s for assessment years 2013-20 7, and 2017-2018 in the follow -2014 and 2014-2015, the six y 0 and 31 March 2021 respective 2017 and 2017-2018, the three y and 31 March 2021 respectively. he old regime xxx
xxx f TOLA is to provide relaxation e specified Acts, which fell 0 March 2020 to 31 March 20 drop of the COVID-19 pandem
hich the s of tely the tion hout ment 014, wing year ely; year n of for 021. mic, TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
wh imp com leg req and gov per cha sug ind tax pay wit dea 63. cer dur Sec act Ma act Con spe 24(O&M) ich impeded the functioning of position of national and local lo mmon people, including litigants gal obligations. The COVID19 pa quired legislatures across the wo d policies to redress the difficul vernmental authorities. (122) rsons and business entities f aracterised by a lack of cash or ggested that this would imp dividuals and entities would not b xes. Therefore, the World Bank yment deadlines to allow individ th the crisis. (123) Many countri adlines for filing tax returns. TOLA extended the time limits rtain actions under the specifie ring the COVID-19 outbreak. T ction 3(1) indicates that the rela tion whose time limit falls for com arch 2021. Section 3(1) is only c tions contemplated under the nsequently, the amendment or su ecified Acts will not affect the ap -47- f the government at all levels. T ckdowns created difficulties for s and assesses, to comply with th andemic and the ensuing lockdow orld to dynamically adapt their la lties faced by persons, entities, a The World Bank identified t faced severe financial situati easily convertible-to-cash assets pact revenue collection beca be in a position to pay the asses advised deferral of tax filings a duals and business entities to co ies across the world have extend ts for completion or compliance ed Act, which fell for complet The use of the expression "any" axation applies to "all" or "eve mpletion from 20 March 2020 to concerned with the performance provisions of the specified A ubstitution of a provision under pplication of TOLA, so long as The the heir wns aws and that ions s. It ause ssed and ope ded e of tion " in ery" o 31 e of cts. the the TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
act the 202 64. ens pro Tax of pro pro the mu har b. R 65. not Sec not the ass pro rea situ bef 24(O&M) tion contemplated under the pro e period specified by TOLA, tha
When enacting a statute, the sure that the provisions of one ovisions of another legislation. x Act is to levy tax on income and the Government. On the other ovide relaxation of the time f oceedings falling for completion e two enactments operate in sepa st ensure that the provisions of rmoniously unless there is an irr Reading TOLA into Section 149 Section 3(1) of TOLA applies tice" under the Income Tax Ac ction 3(1) of TOLA will apply tice under section 148 of the Inc e time limits of four years and six sessment years as specified und ovided a relaxation of the assessment notice under Section uations where the time limit sp fore 20 March 2020. The effec -48- ovision falls for completion dur at is, 20 March 2020 to 31 Ma e legislature often endeavours e legislation do not conflict w (125) The purpose of the Inco d raise revenues for the function hand, the purpose of TOLA is for completion of any actions n within a particular period. Th arate and distinct fields. This Co the two enactments are interpre reconcilable conflict between the 9 to the action of "issuance of a ct. The relaxation provided un to the issuance of a reassessm come Tax Act. TOLA did not ame x years from the end of the relev der the Income Tax Act. It mer time period for issuance of n 148. TOLA has no application pecified under Section 149 expi ct of TOLA is that at the time
ring arch s to with ome ning s to or hus, ourt eted em. any nder ment end vant rely f a n in ired e of TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
issu to d and not am Sec was ins Sec exte diff 66. by the spe Go diff 202 lim 202
Inc to m sub 24(O&M) uance of a reassessment notice u determine two things: (i) the tim d (ii) the extent of relaxati tifications for issuance of notic end section 149 of the Income ction 149 to determine the time s the legislative intent behin tance, the six year time limit for ction 149(1)(b) of the old regime ended the period for issuing no fficulties that arose because of th Section 3(1) of TOLA allowed notification "such other date aft e time limit for completion or co ecified Acts. The provision vernment to specify different dat fferent actions. The notifications 21 extend the operation of TOL mit for completing actions under 21. Section 2(1)(b)(ii) of TOLA def come Tax Act. After 1 April 202 mean the Income Tax Act as ame bstitution of Sections 147 to 1 -49- under Section 148, the Revenue e limit specified under Section 1 ion provided by TOLA and ces. Thus, although TOLA did e Tax Act, it has to be read w limit for issuance of a notice. T nd the enactment of TOLA. F r assessment year 2013- 2014 un e expired on 31 March 2020. TO otice until 30 June 2021, given e COVID-19 pandemic. the Central Government to spe fter the 31st day of March, 2021" ompliance of any action under also empowered the Cen tes for completion or compliance dated 31 March 2021 and 27 Ap LA by providing an extended t r the Income Tax Act till 30 Ju efines `specified Act' to include 21, Section 2(1)(b)(ii) must be re ended by the Finance Act 2021. T 51 will not affect the purpose
has 49; its not with This For nder OLA the cify " as the tral e of pril ime June the ead The e of TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
TO or Ma Inc spe for 68. the retr TO the rea Rev Sec not exte ben for xxx G. 114 24(O&M) OLA, which is, to provide relaxat compliance of any actions fa arch 2020 and 31 March 2021. come Tax Act after 1 April 2 ecified under the substituted pro completion between 20 March 2 After 1 April 2021, the Income e substituted provisions. Th rospectively for past assessmen OLA was still in existence, and th e application of TOLA and its no assessment notice under Sectio venue would still have to look a ction 149 of the new regime; an tice as extended by TOLA and its end the operation of the old law nefit from the extended time lim completion between 20 March 2 x
xxx
Conclusions
In view of the above discussion a. After 1 April 2021, the Inc with the substituted provision -50- tion of the time limit for complet alling for completion between TOLA will continue to apply to 2021 if any action or proceed ovisions of the Income Tax Act fa 2020 and 31 March 2021. e Tax Act has to be read along w e substituted provisions ap nt years as well. On 1 April 20 he Revenue could not have igno otifications. Therefore, for issuin on 148 after 1 April 2021, at: (i) the time limit specified un nd (ii) the time limit for issuance s notifications. The Revenue can w under TOLA, but it can certai mit for completion of actions fall 2020 and 31 March 2021. xxx
xxx n, we conclude that: come Tax Act has to be read alo ns;
tion 20 the ding falls with pply 021, ored ng a the nder e of nnot inly ling x ong TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
24(O&M) b. TOLA will continue to ap April 2021 if any action o substituted provisions of completion between 20 Marc c. Section 3(1) of TOLA ov Tax Act only to the extent of of a reassessment notice und d. TOLA will extend the tim the authority specified under whether TOLA will apply to this: if the time limit of assessment year falls betwe 2021, then the specified au extended time till 30 June 20 e. In the case of Section 151 time limit of four years from between 20 March 2020 and authority under Section 151( 2021 to grant approval; f. The directions in Ashish A the ninety thousand reassess regime during the period 1 A g. The time during which th to be stayed is from the date -51- pply to the Income Tax Act afte or proceeding specified under the Income Tax Act falls ch 2020 and 31 March 2021; verrides section 149 of the Inco f relaxing the time limit for issua der Section 148; e limit for the grant of sanction r Section 151. The test to determ o Section 151 of the new regime three years from the end of een 20 March 2020 and 31 Ma uthority under Section 151(i) 021 to grant approval; of the old regime, the test is: if the end of an assessment year fa d 31 March 2021, then the specif (2) has extended time till 31 Ma Agarwal (supra) will extend to sment notices issued under the April 2021 and 30 June 2021; e show cause notices were deem e of issuance of the deemed not er 1 the for ome nce n by mine e is an arch has f the falls fied arch all old med tice TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202 2014-2015 wou would expire on of limitation r 30.06.2021. If th And till 31.03.2 31.03.2020. Sec Tax Act. Secti compliance of 24(O&M) between 1 April 2021 and relevant information and ma the assesses in terms of the Ashish Agarwal (supra), and the assesses to respond to the h. The assessing officers reassessment notice under Se the time limit surviving und TOLA. All notices issued bey barred and liable to be set as N e present case pertains to the ye ara 19(e) of the judgment of Ho ajeev Bansal (Supra), as referred rescribed under Section 149 of th the Finance Act, 2021 w.e.f. 0 uld expire on 31.03.2018 if it is n 31.03.2021 if it is to be issued read with TOLA is taken, th he period of three years is taken 2018, TOLA was not applicable ction 2 (1) (b) defines “Specified on 3 (1) of TOLA extended action under the “Specified A -52- d 30 June 2021 till the supply aterial by the assessing officers directions issued by this Cour d the period of two weeks allowed e show cause notices; and s were required to issue ection 148 of the new regime wit der the Income Tax Act read w eyond the surviving period are t side; ear 2014-2015. A perusal of ta on’ble the Supreme Court in Un d to above, shows that the time li he Income Tax Act, 1961, which 1.04.2021 for the assessment y to be issued within three years a within six years. Further, if exp hen the period would expire n, that would expire on 31.03.20 since TOLA came into force w. d Act” to mean and include Inco the time limit for completion Act”, which fell for completion
y of s to t in d to the thin with ime able nion imit h is year and piry on 018. .e.f. ome n or n or TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
compliance dur Section 3 (1) em 31.03.2021 and 15. In Union of India year 2014-2015 and if after the limit till 30.06.2 the Income Ta extended period subsequent asse Sections 144 an in view of the ju Union of India
In v dated 27.07.202 under Section 14 are, hereby, set a 17. Pen
(ARUN PAL
JUDGE
March 10, 2025 Tripti/pj
Wh
Wh 24(O&M) hether speaking/non-speaking : S hether reportable
: Y -53- 20 and 31.12.2020 to 31.03.20 ent to extend the time limit beyo .06.2021. by Hon’ble the Supreme Court ven if the notices for the assessm ars, the same expired on 31.03.20 to be applied, it extended the ti nt case, notice under Section 148 27.07.2022, which is beyond 27.07.2022 under Section 148 a 23 under Section 147 read w 1961 would be barred by limitat ed by Hon’ble the Supreme Cour writ petition is allowed and not assessment order dated 21.03.20 for the assessment year 2014-20 stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE Speaking Yes
ond t in ment 021 ime 8 of the and with tion rt in tice 023 TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
CWP-4789-202
24(O&M) -54-
TRIPTI SAINI 2025.04.11 09:48 integrity of this document
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026