THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI T V MUKUND

PDF · subscribers
ITA/815/2008HC KarnatakaKAHC01036529200814 August 2012Bench: B.MANOHAR,K.SREEDHAR RAO2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court, in its decision, has directly addressed the appeal by referencing a Supreme Court judgment. The Court stated that in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Guffic CHEM (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & anr. reported in (2011) 332 ITR 602, the questions of law are answered against the revenue. Consequently, the appeal filed by the revenue has been dismissed. The specific findings of the ITAT or the Assistant Commissioner that were challenged are not elaborated upon, but the High Court's decision implies that the ITAT's order was in favor of the assessee, and the Supreme Court's precedent supported this outcome, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.

What were the facts?

The Commissioner of Income Tax and the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellants) have filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated March 11, 2008, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore Bench, in ITA No. 751/BANG/2007. This appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2002-03. The Appellants seek to set aside the ITAT's order and confirm the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1), Bangalore. The Respondent is Shri T.V. Mukund.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to formulate substantial questions of law stated therein. (This is a procedural question regarding the formulation of substantial questions of law for the appeal). Assessee's Contentions: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee (Respondent) in this High Court appeal. The decision appears to be based on a Supreme Court precedent. Revenue's Contentions: The revenue (Appellants) sought to allow the appeal and set aside the ITAT's order, thereby confirming the orders of the Assistant Commissioner. The specific grounds or arguments leading to this prayer are not detailed in the provided text, beyond the general aim of the appeal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR ITA No.815/2008 BETWEEN : 1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE.

2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1) C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE. .. APPELLANTS (By Sri K V ARAVIND, ADV.) AND : SHRI T V MUKUND C/O TRUST PACK 2/1, 3RD CROSS, MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE. ...RESPONDENT This ITA filed u/S.260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of Order dated 11-03-2008 passed in ITA No. 751/BANG/2007, for the Assessment Year 2002-03, praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: i. formulate the substantial questions of law stated therein,

2 ii. allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITAT Bangalore in ITA No. 751/BNG/2007,dated 11-03-2008 confirm the orders of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax , Circle-3(1), Bangalore.. This ITA coming on for final hearing this day, K.SREEDHAR RAO, J, delivered the following: JUDGMENT In view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Guffic CHEM (P) Ltd, -vs- Commissioner of Income Tax & anr. reported in (2011) 332 ITR 602, the questions of law are answered against the revenue. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE bkm.

More judgments on Section 260-A

All 2,570 judgments and leading authorities on Section 260-A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →