ASLAM ZACKRIA SAIT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. The memo was placed on record. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No findings were made on the merits of the case, and no specific issues were decided. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by Aslam Zackria Sait (the appellant) against an order dated May 17, 2017, passed in ITA No.453/BANG/2017 for the Assessment Year 2012-2013. The respondent in the appeal was the Income Tax Officer, Ward – 1(2)(3). The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant was represented by his GPA Holder, Mr. Mohammed Daanish Zackira. The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was hearing the appeal.
What were the issues?
The High Court was to decide the appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The specific grounds of appeal and the arguments of the assessee and the revenue are not recorded in the judgment. The judgment only states that the learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. Therefore, no substantive issues were argued or decided by the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2018
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV ITA NO.757/2017
BETWEEN:
ASLAM ZACKRIA SAIT NO.6/4, MARTELLO BOULEVARD 3RD FLOOR, MUSUEM ROAD BENGALURU 560001 PAN: ABOPS8691J (REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER MR.MOHAMMED DAANISH ZACKIRA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
…. APPELLANT (BY SRI CHYTHANYA K.K., ADV.)
AND
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER ITO, WARD – 1(2)(3) 6TH FLOOR, HMT BHAVAN BELLARY ROAD
2 BENGALURU 560032 …RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 17.5.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.453/BANG/2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, B.S.PATIL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE DM/-
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026