THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S FAIR ISSAC INDIA SOFTWARE PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The Revenue's counsel filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. The memo was taken on record. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No decision on the merits of the substantial questions of law was made as the appeal was withdrawn by the appellant.
What were the facts?
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income-tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax) against an order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bengaluru. The ITAT's order, dated April 5, 2019, in C.O. No.137/BANG/2015, pertained to Assessment Year 2010-2011. The ITAT had confirmed the order of the Appellate Commissioner, which in turn had upheld the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax. The appeal is filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The respondent is M/s. Fair Isaac India Software Pvt. Ltd.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the substantial questions of law are to be formulated for the appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue's contention is to allow the appeal and set aside the order of the ITAT, thereby confirming the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. The Respondent (assessee) is served but unrepresented, and therefore, no arguments are recorded on their behalf.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
I.T.A. NO.688 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIT(A)
5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA BENGALURU-560095.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CIRCLE-3(1)(2), PRESENT ADDRESS
CIRCLE-3(1)(1), 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. ... APPELLANTS (By Sri. ARVIND K.V. ADV.)
AND:
M/S. FAIR ISSAC INDIA SOFTWARE PVT. LTD., GROUND FLOOR, TITANIUM 135, OLD AIRPORT ROAD KODIHALLI, BENGALURU-560017 PAN: AABCF 7670G. ... RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) - - -
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O. NO.137/BANG/2015 DATED 5.4.2019 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011 ANNEXURE-C CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the revenue has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026