THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S INTERGARDEN (INDIA) PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the learned Counsel for the appellants (Revenue) submitted that the appellants do not press the appeal. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal as not pressed. No decision was made on the merits of the case or the substantial questions of law that were intended to be formulated. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal.
What were the facts?
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income-tax and Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax) under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order dated March 18, 2016, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bengaluru, in ITA No.968/BANG/2013. The appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2007-2008. The respondent is M/s Intergarden (India) Pvt. Ltd. The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard the appeal for admission.
What were the issues?
The substantial questions of law were to be formulated by the High Court. The Revenue, represented by Sri K.V.Aravind, submitted that they do not press the appeal. No specific arguments from either side regarding the merits of the case or the ITAT's order were recorded in the judgment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No.568/2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.568/2016
BETWEEN :
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX, CIT(A)
5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA
BENGALURU – 560 095
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-11(44)
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
WARD-3(1)(1), 2ND FLOOR
BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA
BENGALURU – 560 095
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND :
M/S INTERGARDEN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. NO.68, OBALAPURA VILLAGE ANNGONDANAHALLI HOBLI HOSKOTE TALUK BENGALURU – 560 067
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
ITA No.568/2016
-2-
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.03.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.968/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007- 2008.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Ag.CJ (Oral):
Sri K.V.Aravind, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the appellants do not press the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. Appeal dismissed. Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
KSR
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Sujit Paswan @ Sujit Pasman vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026