THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRITISH ENGINES (INDIA) PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal. The learned counsel for the appellants (Revenue) fairly submitted that the question raised in this appeal has already been answered against the appellants by this Court in the case of CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd. [2012] 341 ITR 385 (Karn). Based on this submission, the Court found no reason to entertain the appeal and accordingly dismissed it. The specific issue decided by the ITAT and the reasoning behind the precedent case are not elaborated in this judgment, but the principle applied is that a prior decision of the High Court on a similar question of law binds the present appeal.
What were the facts?
The appeal is filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax and the Income-tax Officer against an order dated January 22, 2016, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.1277/Bang/2014. The assessment year in question is 2008-2009. The ITAT's order is under challenge. The procedural history involves the filing of this appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the revenue. The High Court is considering the admission of this appeal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the substantial question of law, as formulated by the appellants (Revenue), is to be decided by this Court. The Revenue is appealing against the order of the ITAT. The specific substantial question of law is not detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. The Revenue's contention is that the ITAT's order is erroneous and requires setting aside. The Respondent (assessee), M/s. British Engines (India) Pvt. Ltd., is not recorded as having made any specific arguments in this excerpt, as the appeal was dismissed on the submission of the Revenue's counsel.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No.416/2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2017
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.416/2016
BETWEEN :
THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CIT (A), 5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560 095
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER
WARD-1(1)(4), PRESENT ADDRESS
7TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560 095
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI ARAVIND K.V. ADVOCATE)
AND :
M/S.BRITISH ENGINES (INDIA) PVT.LTD., NO.6A, ATTIBELE INDUSTRIAL AREA BENGALURU-562 107
...RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE TRIBUNAL ORDER DATED:22.01.2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.1277/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA No.416/2016
-2-
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that the question raised in this appeal is answered against the appellants by this Court in CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd. [2012] 341 ITR 385 (Karn). The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Appeal dismissed. Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026