TTK PRESTIGE LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

PDF · subscribers
ITA/309/2014HC KarnatakaKAHC01020277201415 September 2020Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Karnataka considered the memo filed by the assessee seeking leave to withdraw the appeal. The memo was taken on record. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No decision was made on the merits of the substantial questions of law that were to be formulated. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee, TTK Prestige Ltd., filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against an order dated April 11, 2014, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.130/BANG/2011. This appeal pertained to the assessment year 2006-07. The revenue was represented by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-12(4). The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court was to consider substantial questions of law formulated by the assessee.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be allowed. The assessee, through its counsel, sought leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. The revenue was represented by its counsel. The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by either side regarding the merits of the case, as the appeal was withdrawn by the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

AND

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD

I.T.A. NO.309 OF 2014

BETWEEN:

TTK PRESTIGE LTD., 11TH FLOOR, BRIGADE TOWERS 135, BRIGADE ROAD BANGALORE-560025. ... APPELLANT (BY Dr. R.B. KRISHNA, ADV.)

AND:

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12(4), 4TH FLOOR RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, OPP. RBI BANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, FOR SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV.,) - - -

THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 11-04-2014 PASSED IN ITA NO.130/BANG/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07, PRAYING TO:

I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11-04-2014 IN ITA NO.130/BANG/2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07.

THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dr.R.B.Krishna, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for the revenue.

2.

Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- JUDGE

Sd/- JUDGE

More judgments on Section 260-A

All 2,570 judgments and leading authorities on Section 260-A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →