PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 vs. M/S THOMSON HOLDINGS (INDIA) LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Karnataka, in light of the Circular dated 08.08.2019, held that the appeal is not maintainable because the tax limit is less than Rs.One Crore. The Court did not delve into the merits of the case or the ITAT's order. The reasoning is solely based on the administrative instruction provided by the circular, which sets a threshold for filing appeals. Therefore, the operative direction is to dispose of the appeal as not maintainable. No issue was expressly left undecided, as the appeal was dismissed on a preliminary ground.
What were the facts?
This is an appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7 and the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-16(1), New Delhi (the Revenue), against an order dated 07.09.2018 passed in ITA No.1093/Del/2013 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the Assessment Year 2007-2008. The appeal was filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The amount in dispute is not explicitly stated but the appeal is disposed of based on a circular concerning the tax limit.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal is maintainable in light of the Circular dated 08.08.2019, given that the tax limit is less than Rs.One Crore? The Revenue contended that the appeal should be decided on merits. However, the judgment does not record specific arguments from the Revenue regarding the merits of the case. The judgment relies solely on a circular to dispose of the appeal. The Respondent (M/s. Thomson Holdings (India) Ltd.) did not present any arguments as the appeal was dismissed on maintainability grounds.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA 174/2019 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021 PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
I.T.A.No.174/2019 BETWEEN: 1. Pr.Commissioner of
Income Tax-7,
BMTC Complex,
Koramangala, Bangalore.
The Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax, Circle-16(1),
New Delhi.
… APPELLANTS
(By Sri E.I.Sanmathi, Adv.)
AND:
M/s. Thomson Holdings (India) Ltd., 302(3B), World Trade Tower, Barakhamba Land, New Delhi.
… RESPONDENT
This Income Tax Appeal is filed under section 260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated 07.09.2018 passed in ITA No.1093/Del/2013 for Assessment Year 2007- 2008, praying to decide the foregoing question of law and /or
ITA 174/2019 2
such other questions of law as may be formulated by the Hon’ble Court as deemed fit, etc.
This appeal coming on for Orders, this day, Satish Chandra Sharma J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
In the light of the Circular dated 08.08.2019, as the tax limit is less than Rs.One Crore, the appeal is disposed of as not maintainable.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026