THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that in view of Instruction No.3/11 issued by the CBDT, which stipulates that appeals with a tax effect below Rs.10 lakhs are not maintainable, the present appeal would not be maintainable. The Court did not delve into the merits of the case or the specific grounds raised by the Revenue. The reasoning was solely based on the administrative instruction regarding the monetary limit for appeals. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal. No issues were left undecided.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS and the Income-Tax Officer, Ward-16(2) (the Revenue) against an order dated 07/11/2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore in ITA No.502/Bang/2013. The assessment year in question was 2009-2010. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue sought to set aside the ITAT's order and confirm the orders of the Appellate Commissioner and the Income Tax Officer. The respondent in the appeal was Bangalore International Airport Ltd. (the Assessee).
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal is maintainable in light of Instruction No.3/11 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) regarding the tax effect threshold for filing appeals. The Revenue contended that the appeal should be heard on merits. The Assessee's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The issue revolves around the applicability of the CBDT instruction to the present appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2015
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
ITA NO 167 OF 2014
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS NO.59, HMT BHAVAN 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE.
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD-16(2) NO.59, HMT BHAVAN 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE. ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND
BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. ADMINISTRATION BLOCK, I BLOCK, DEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 300.
...RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 07/11/2013 PASSED IN ITA NO.502/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 PRAYING TO 1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED
ABOVE 2) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.502/BANG/2013 DATED 7.11.2013 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-16(2), BANGALORE. .
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J. DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
In view of Instruction No.3/11 issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax (CBDT), since the tax effect in this case is below Rs.10 lakhs, this appeal would not be maintainable. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE TL
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026