SHRI ARUN KUMAR B M vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court accepted the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant praying for the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No decision was made on the merits of the case. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Shri Arun Kumar.B.M., filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against an order dated February 19, 2020, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bengaluru, in ITA No.667/Bang/2017. The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2013-14. The appellant sought to set aside the ITAT's order to the extent it was prejudicial to him. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court was hearing the appeal for orders.
What were the issues?
The High Court had to decide whether to allow the appeal filed by the assessee, Shri Arun Kumar.B.M., against the order of the ITAT, Bengaluru, for the assessment year 2013-14. The specific grounds of appeal and the arguments presented by the assessee and the revenue are not detailed in the provided judgment. The judgment only records that the appellant's counsel filed a memo praying for the withdrawal of the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA 101/2020 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021 PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
I.T.A.No.101/2020 BETWEEN: Shri Arun Kumar.B.M., S/o Malavaiah.R.M., # 37, 1st "A" Cross, 'Udayaravi', Veerappa Road, Hanumanthanagar, Bengaluru - 560 019, PAN: AHDPA9846L
… APPELLANT
(By Sri Narendra Kumar Jayantilal Jain, Adv.)
AND:
Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(3)(5), Bengaluru - 560 095.
… RESPONDENT
This Income Tax Appeal is filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961, praying to set aside the impugned order dated 19.02.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, in ITA No.667/Bang/2017 for the
ITA 101/2020 2
assessment year 2013-14 to the extent prejudicial to the appellant.
This appeal coming on for Orders, this day, Satish Chandra Sharma J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Learned Counsel for the appellant has filed a memo praying for withdrawal of the appeal.
Memo is accepted. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026